If this shit keeps up I'm going to initiate a class action lawsuit against the Twins on behalf of all the whiplash victims in Twins Territory.
I go away for a week on the heels of a nice little rebound series against the Angels (the Twins had won the first two games when I hit the road for a cabin in Vermont), and the next time I had an opportunity to look they'd dropped five straight.
That was bad news.
On my way back they turned around and won the last two games of the Cleveland series.
That was good news, and when I finally got a chance to investigate further I discovered that while the Twins were going 8-8 in the first two-and-a-half weeks out of the break, Detroit was going 8-10 and losing four in a row, while Cleveland was 8-9 and losing three-of-four to Boston and two-of-three to the Twins. Which meant that as I was getting settled back in at my sweltering apartment in south Minneapolis, Minnesota was seven games back in the Central, having finally, almost miraculously, managed to pick up two games in the standings in two days.
That was more good news, no?
And now the Royals --against whom the Twins have thirteen remaining games-- are coming to town for four games. That would have been good news a couple months ago, but at the moment it could go either way. The Royals are vastly improved, and have now won four straight and nine-of-sixteen since the break. They're also 3-2 against the Twins thus far.
The rest of the way the Twins will face division opponents 35 times (besides the aforementioned thirteen against KC, they have ten games vs. Cleveland, and six against both Detroit and Chicago). They're 16-21 against Central clubs to this point, so obviously they're going to have to perform a whole lot better.
More bad news: the Twins have averaged just 3.38 runs a game since the break. Despite being respectable (and in many instances more than respectable) the starting pitchers are 4-7 during that same stretch --Matt Garza, for instance, has a 1.96 ERA in three starts, but has an 0-2 record to show for it.
And as of this moment --with the trade deadline clock approaching the 24-hour mark-- there has been no solid indication that any sort of move is imminent.
And that also is bad news, because with the exception of Justin Morneau, Luis Castillo, and (egad!) Jason Tyner, the Twins offense has been brutal. Torii Hunter is hitting just .224 in the second half, and even Joe Mauer is struggling to the point where it might be time to start talking about a sophomore slump.
I've been out of commission for a week, so I haven't yet caught up on any of the local scuttlebutt, but I can't conceive of anything short of a blockbuster trade that would either raise my blood pressure or significantly improve the Twins' chances the rest of the way.


One-stop indeed! I'll be deleting all my other bookmarks now...
Just part of my mission to make this a one-stop info-mart, Donnelly. I'm all about broadening minds and stimulating debate beyond the world of sports.
Something tells me Zellar received feedback that he wasn't providing enough links in his blog. Nothing like a little overkill to make a point! I remain equally flabbergasted by this team. Just when they looked like they were circling the bowl, they go and win three games with three dominant pitching performances and just enough timely hitting. They're still two bats short of being able to contend this year, unless they think they're going to win a lot of 3-1 games the rest of the year. But I don't think they're going to trade Hunter. TR wants to save face with the fans and doesn't want to be seen as the guy who gave up on a season when the team was just six games out of the Wild Card. Still, the smart move would be to trade Hunter (assuming you could get legit CF/3B/bullpen prospects), then immediately announce a six-year, $100 million deal with Santana (assuming he'd sign for that). That would mitigate some of the PR hit from trading Hunter, while setting the team up for the future with the top pitcher in the game inked to a long-term deal.
Will it happen? It's anybody's guess. But if it does, I'm sure Zellar will provide us some interesting links...
PD
When you add 13 to the equation.
Which is the number of games remaining with KC.
Which is mentioned in the same sentence.
As well as in the previous paragraph.
And which is now 12.
how does 10+6+6=35?