One of our correspondents the other day bemoaned our Strib coverage as appealing to "about 500 readers" and asked that we please write about something else. I hear you, brother (though I think the 500 number is WAY too high). I left the Strib because I didn't want to think about it all the time and would much prefer to concentrate on other local media, but the management weasels over on Portland just won't let up.
Arrived home from the North Shore Sunday night to find that the Strib's longtime contact with the outside world--the reader's representative--is the latest position to be whacked, or semi-whacked, depending on how you read the memo (posted below).
The paper's ombudsman position, created in the late '70s, was one of the first in the country. For years, Lou Gelfand handled the duties and was notable in his willingness to bite senior management's hand when required. Kate Parry, who was imported from the Pioneer Press about three years ago, lacked Gelfand's chutzpah during a time when those hands needed some serious gnawing. Well, at least she answered the phone. Now, with the switchboard operators gone and an Orwellian computerized phone system in place, and Parry reassigned as a health care editor, readers with issues are going to be hard-pressed to find someone to bitch to in the newsroom.
That's where my esteemed colleague comes in. On the newsroom's intranet communications board, one poster wondered if the new reader's rep might be "Brian Lambert at the Rake." I think that's a great idea--I'd post his phone number right now, but he's kayaking and can't defend himself.
From: "Rene Sanchez"
To:
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:07:34 -0500
Subject: Kate Parry is our new Health Care Editor
Dear staff:
We're pleased to announce that Kate Parry will be our new health care editor, taking on responsibility for coverage in print and on line. She will also occasionally serve as an at-large editor in the newsroom.
As you all know, we created one health care team to serve needs across the newsroom, including business, metro and features. This team has some of our most experienced reporters and writers, and we are looking to this team to produce some of our most ambitious journalism. In addition, we will need to expand our coverage online headed into 2008. We searched for several months for the right person to lead this coverage before coming to the conclusion that Kate had the best mix of skills for this important job. We know that she will provide thoughtful leadership and sophisticated editing; she has a long track record as an award-winning journalist.
When Kate came here nearly three years ago, it was with the understanding that the job of reader representative would not be a lifetime appointment and we discussed a tenure of about three years. I think we can all agree that Kate has served in that role admirably, and with courage. She has taken on some very difficult topics in her column, and spent hours listening to readers, and addressing the public. She has tackled prickly issues in the newsroom too, negotiating differences between writers and readers. We have been lucky to have her in that role.
But in a time of dwindling resources, we need more help with the journalism in the newsroom in order to serve our readers at the level they deserve.
We plan to keep the readers'rep position open while we evaluate our options although it's likely that in the future this will be a part-time position. In the meantime, we hope to step up communication in other ways. We will, of course, continue to answer all readers calls and report significant issues to editors in the room. Department heads will be asked to take on responsibility for correcting errors in their sections. And newsroom leaders will be asked to increase communication with the public. I will be resuming the editor's blog and the editor's column that Anders started, and I will occasionally ask other top editors to share that responsibility. We will also take on more responsibility for outside speaking engagements to share with the public the work we are doing in the newsroom. I have done two in the last week alone.
Kate will start her new job Monday, Oct. 8. Since her work will cross all departments, she will report to Deputy Managing Editor Rene Sanchez. Please join us in thanking her for her work as the reader's representative and wishing her well in this new role.
Nancy, Scott and Rene


Obviously Justin is slurping at the same Hollywood expense account trough / starlet cleavage showcase that Lambert so obviously gorged at for years.
Who wouldn't?
One last word, only because I just saw TB's comment: Believe me, I don't run anything anywhere.
Hey, L&R: There are two of you now, so how about posting an item more than every other day? I need my fix.
I think you can make a strong arguement that an ombudsman is the ultimate example of "local" coverage, since it's the type of reporting which should (at least in theory) speak strongest to local readers.
Maybe the answer for the Strib is to outsource the position to some local journalist. Ideally, someone who hasn't worked at the paper and is able to cover it without insitutional bias.
As for Neil Justin, I'm not sure what the paper wanted him to do, but it's clear he's not putting time into his blog, which was last updated on September 20th (and only had four posts in the entire month).
http://www.startribune.com/blogs/justin/
And in the name of accuracy, I'll offer a correction to Mr. Bartel, with one l. Fast fingers got the best of me.
One L in Bartel, v, while we're on the fact checking topic. Also, the point was that you ran it on the top of the front page, more than you took it, but if you want to quibble...
Speaking of bosses and fact-checking, maybe you can tell Tom Bartell that's an AP photo he scolds the Strib for wasting its time in taking. Tell him to approve the waiting comment -- and maybe correct himself, if he's so interested in accuracy.
By the way, what's going on with the absence of ``hyperlocal'' in media coverage at the Strib? Seems that Neil Justin is doing more Hollywood stuff than ever -- exactly the opposite of what the editors vowed -- while the Twin Cities' print, radio and TV scene is either wholly uncovered or left to CJ's snarky waste of space. Did Justin back his bosses down with incriminating photos or something?
Seems like this blog is the best reader's rep the newspaper could ever, ever have. The pain won't end until the dead-tree issue is replaced by the downloaded one.
i,, for one, am overwhelmed by the compassion in this group.
Please continue to keep an eye on the Strib, Brian. I was a regular reader of your TV coverage in the PP even while I was working for that evil paper across the river.
I was proud that Minneapolis was a pioneer with the concept of reader's representative, or ombudsman, in the 1970s. Dick Cunningham, who made his mark as a reporter in the years of civil-rights turmoil (reporting from Alabama for the Tribune, he broke the story of Viola Liuzzo's killing in 1965), later an assistant city editor, was the Tribune's first readers' rep. Even though he was a personal friend and fellow member of the newsroom jug band, he held my feet to the fire when he thought it was necessary. He went on to head the national newspaper ombudsmen's organization in New York and teach at NYU; Lou Gelfand succeeded him at what was by then the Star Tribune. Meanwhile, Deborah Howell, former managing editor of the Minneapolis Star, is now the Washington Post's readers' rep.
I think it's a shame that the position has for all practical purposes disappeared from a paper that gave it to the industry. Accountability and credibility will suffer.
Hey, hey, no picking on the Bryn Mawr Bugle! (Meanwhile, those of us in the neighborhood and community newpaper community are out here watching the hyper-local movement at both dailies with horrid fascination)
Agree with "reader." The Strib is cutting edge these days for the decline and fall of the mid-size metro daily newspaper. A great lab experiment, with an unfortunate number of newsroom folks as white rats. Too much change, coming way too quickly, bungled by newbies at most key posts, for an ownershp that doesn't do journalism, with a laughable court trial and massive legal fees to boot.
Any reader rep would have to be a liar, filled with self-loathing, utterly worthless, complete toadie or soon reassigned. Which is what we now see with Parry. Better that the profiteers do away with the position entirely, so as to not insult any further, with spin and b.s., intelligence of potential customers.
Oh no! Say it isn't so! No more readers rep? When will the madness stop? And what's next...no more horoscope?
Massive cutbacks in staff. New "tow the line" tone at the top. "Local only" editorials. Longtime editorial page editor out, lackey in? Management follies (Par in, Par out.) You need to focus on the Strib because of the size of its newsroom compared to everything else and because of the profound changes happening there.
Kate was a huge disappointment as Readers Rep, serving largely as an apologist for management and conventional newspaper thinking, unless a topic happened to hit one of her hot buttons, mostly revolving around gender issues or Sid Hartman, whom she took after relentlessly.
The ST should find a non-employee to serve as RR for a defined tenure, much as the NYT has done. We're way past the point where anyone accountable to the editor for their salary and career can be considered independent or a true representative of the reader.
When the big hoo ha erupted over an editorial stafffer's alleged plagerism last year, it was Parry who got on the story, it was Parry who said that Albright's explanation that it was inadvertent "strained credulilty" and it was Parry who pointed out that Albright's belated Investigation of the matter covered only one year of the alleged perpetrator's thirty years at the paper. So if you took the trouble to read her carefully, she was the one, the only one, who had the guts to dig into the issue. And if they had let her be, I'm sure she would have done the heavy lifting on the Par case and Albright's own dismissal for which to this date nary a world has been published on the editorial pages.
The Stribugle has become a paper in denial, still kidding itself that it can get away with the kind of contempt for its readers that has been its hallmark for lo these many years. The times and the technology and the widespread availability of alternative sources of information have caught up with it, but the attitude hasn't changed, and never will. That's why the Stribugle, the merger of the Strib with the Bryn Mawr Bugle to form a take no prisoners, you've read it here first, shopper, free at Cub is the answer." Hey, bagger, yes you, putting my prunewhip in my grocery bag, didn't you used to.write those thumbsuckers for our beloved old Strib?"
Dan Cohen
Yes, unless of course sex is part of the health beat.
Re: Public sex article debacle in VitaMN
Hopefully Parry will be better suited to her new assignment.