High: 13° / Low: 7° — Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul
(UPDATED WITH RESPONSE FROM MPR)
As certain as the cycle of the sun and stars is the question of how much money Minnesota Public Radio gets in state subsidies ... and why.
The issue bobbed up again in the context of Joel Kramer's to-be-announced on-line news site. Thanks to Julie Dinger in the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library at the Capitol I can offer this
for those of you interested in how much Bill Kling receives/snookered the Capitol Hill turnips out of this past year:
Subd. 6.Public Broadcasting
(a) $6,650,000 is for grants to noncommercial
television stations to assist with the continued
conversion to a digital broadcast signal as
mandated by the federal government. This
appropriation must be used to assist each
station to complete its digital production
facilities and interconnect with other
Minnesota public television stations. In
order to qualify for these grants, a station
must meet the criteria established for grants
in Minnesota Statutes, section 129D.12,
subdivision 2.
(b) $2,000,000 is for grants to Minnesota
Public Radio to assist with conversion to a
digital broadcast signal.
(c) $2,461,000 the first year and $1,161,000
the second year are for matching grants for
public television.
(d) $200,000 the first year and $200,000
the second year are for public television
equipment grants. Equipment or matching
grant allocations shall be made after
considering the recommendations of the
Minnesota Public Television Association.
(e) $17,000 the first year and $17,000 the
second year are for grants to the Twin Cities
regional cable channel.
(f) $413,000 in fiscal year 2008 and $287,000
in fiscal year 2009 are for community service
grants to public educational radio stations.
(g) $400,000 in fiscal year 2008 and $100,000
in fiscal year 2009 are for equipment grants
to public educational radio stations.
(h) The grants in paragraphs (f) and (g)
must be allocated after considering the
recommendations of the Association of
Minnesota Public Educational Radio Stations
under Minnesota Statutes, section 129D.14.
(i) $830,000 the first year and $190,000
the second year are for equipment grants to
Minnesota Public Radio, Inc.
(j) Any unencumbered balance remaining the
first year for grants to public television or
radio stations does not cancel and is available
for the second
As it is explained to me, the one-time $2 million is for upgrading MPR to all-digital transmission, which, as you can see is something that state has been assisting all public broadcasters in doing. The $830,000 figure is another one-time grant, this time for equipment, and the $190,000 figure is more or less MPR's normal annual equipment subsidy.
(I've asked MPR for a breakdown of what exactly costs $2 million and how that is different from a one-time $830K for new equipment? When they respond, I'll add it to this post.)
So, MPR's take looks pretty fat this biennium. $3.02 million. Or, spun a different way, something like ... 28 cents ... for every man, woman and child in Minnesota ... EVERY DAMNED YEAR!!!!! Well this year and next, I mean. But never mind! I am outraged, dammit! This is beyond Halliburton! Where's the special prosecutor?
After that it drops back into single pennies.
[For those lacking an ear for facetiousness, I'm making a joke here. 28 cents ... a year ... come on. Would you even stop to pick that up if you saw it on the ground?]
Good lobbying help is one way that you keep your hand in the mix when the state starts doling out cash and I admit I missed the part where former Senate Majority Leader Dean Johnson has now registered as an MPR lobbyist.
As I've been saying in the "comments" section, in an ideal world the State would consider funding credible start-up news ventures like those proposed by Joel Kramer and former City Pages editor, Steve Perry. Likewise, considering MPR's extraordinary financial success you might think someone would be making a more effective argument to fund non-MPR public radio operations more and MPR less.
But the reality is that no matter how much its blood enemies and frequent consumers, like myself, kvetch and squall about what they don't do and how precious an attitude they take toward provocative stories, the public at large regards MPR as ... well worth the comparatively modest money they get out of our pockets.
I mean, a couple months ago I blew the equivalent of almost 15 years of my share of MPR subsidies on one copy of the National Review. And that thing burst into flames right in my hand.
MPR spokeswoman, Christina Schmitt, replied Thursday morning, saying:
Hi Brian,
Thank you for being patient. State funding to MPR is used for capital purposes only; to extend, improve and maintain service outside the Twin Cities area, where the population is less dense and capital fundraising is more difficult. For example, MPR used recently appropriated State funding to install new signals in Hinckley and infrastructure improvements in Duluth, St Peter, Rochester, Worthington, Bemidji and Brainerd. The most recent appropriation will be used entirely for capital projects in greater Minnesota, including the construction of a new station to serve the Roseau / Warroad area of the state.
In the 2007 legislative session, MPR received a one-time appropriation of $2 million for its digital conversion project. During the 2002-2003 biennium, the State of Minnesota provided a special appropriation of $7.8 million to public television for digital conversion. Though on a station-by-station basis, digital conversion for radio is less expensive than that for television, there are more public radio stations. We estimate the total cost of digital conversion for MPR stations alone will be about $6.9 million.
MPR provides important public services to Minnesota in addition to offering multiple channels of public radio service to almost all residents. MPR is the backbone to the State’s Emergency Alert System (EAS), providing the EAS signal to all other broadcasters, including radio, television and cable stations in Minnesota. MPR also serves as the backbone to the State’s AMBER Alert System, the child abduction warning system. In addition, MPR provides the Radio Talking Book to the blind and visually impaired across all of Minnesota on subcarriers of MPR stations, which is produced by Minnesota State Services for the Blind.
Brian, I'm new to your MPR rage, but willing to be enlightened. Why complain about MPR's state grants when tv is getting even more and providing less public service programming?
LAMBERT: My rage is facetious. 28 cents is not worth getting upset about. I'm responding to a comment strng under the Joel Kramer post.
28 cents here and 28 cents there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.
i say give my 28 cents to someone who needs it.
i'm not objecting to paying the 28 cents. i'm objecting to paying it to a wealthy enterprise.
My 28 cents should at least limit the amount of &$%# pledge drives they have.
Seriously, what does frustrate me is how little non-locally produced programming we get here. For example, I would love to hear Harry Shearer's program here. Thank goodness we get This American Life and Car Talk. And of course, All Things Considered. I know they've got to support the home team programming so to speak (and I am assuming its an easy sale for MPR to make to itself) but some variety instead of different variations of similar themes would be nice.
Public Television has a mandate to convert to digital technology by 2009. After 2009 Public Television's non-Digital channels will be taken back by the Federal Government and sold at auction. Public Radio, or any radio station for that matter, does not have such a mandate. It is simply an enhancement to their current service.
Thanks Brian - that's good reporting. It's not the individual 28 cents that's a problem, it's the aggregate millions that bothers me. Seems like they could do better than they do given that much money, plus the $100 million + they have in endowments. To be cliche about it, I'd like to see a thousand flowers bloom instead of one dim bulb.
LAMBERT: As usual, Rob, you are way too kind.
With that kind of endowment, why do they need any public money?
//you are way too kind.
You think I'm overly tough, I'm sure. But try listening to this hour with Richard Perle - from January 2004, I believe, which I had the misfortune of hearing at the time, and you might have some more sympathy for my position.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/midmorning/2004/01/midmorni...
LAMBERT: I remember that one. It should be required listening for the "liberal bias" crowd.
I'll add a little reporting. The most recent tax year for Minnesota Public Radio - DBA Minnesota Public Radio/American Public Media (MPR) at Guidestar.org is 2004. It covers the period July 1, 2004 to June 30 ,2005. In that tax year they had an "excess" (read: profit) of $5.3 million with about $65 million in revenue and about $60 million in expenses. The 990 reports almost $6.6 million in government support - far higher than just the Minnesota portion of its public support. "Membership dues and assessments" raised $570,000 for the organization.
William Kling was paid a total of $461,000, including almost $140,000 in "incentive" pay. The suggested contribution for members at MPR's website is $120 for a year. At that level of support it would take 3,800 contributors just to pay Kling's salary.
LAMBERT: Not to spike your blood pressure, Rob. But my view has always been that $460k is about right for a business as successful as MPR. The problem is when Kling et al get into the obfuscating it. What's that line about how it isn't the crime so much as the cover-up?
Who's on the board of MPR?
At least six members are executives in the financial industry, including representatives from Capital International Research, Lakeside Capital Partners, McBurney Management Advisors, US Bancorp, Piper Jaffray, and Thrivent Financial.
At least 10 members of the board represent large corporations, most based in the Twin Cities, including Best Buy, Medtronic, Target (which also funds the Center of the American Experiment), Ecolab, Select Comfort, Valspar, Cargill, General Mills and the Minnesota Wild hockey team.
PR and headhunter firms are represented with people from Weber Shandwick and the executive search firm SpencerStuart.
On the cultural side, there is a representative from Twin Cities RISE!, the president of the Minneapolis College of Art & Design, and the chancellor of the University of Minnesota, Morris.
That makes at least 18 people from the financial/corporate world, and three from the cultural world, with NO outside journalists on the board.
LAMBERT: Thank you, sir.
"I would love to hear Harry Shearer's program here"
Geez, you can listen to it via streaming media or iTunes. Lord, if you have the ability to complain on an online forum you have the ability to listen to Shearer's show ANY TIME YOU WANT. Where "here" is is rapidly irrelevant. There's a ton of great public-radio programming out there we don't have access to Minnesota -- like Left, Right and Center, Says You -- that's very accessible via the Web. Hell, you can listen to regional editions of BBC News if you want to know what's happening in Wales.
This is why the Web really does change everything and why MPR and PRI may face more challenges than their leadership understands: they're essentially distributors at a time when the rules of distribution are changing rapidly. To make it even more difficult, PRI doesn't control most of its own content: for instance, Keillor controls his show and Feldman his, and Chicago Public Radio controls This American Life. You can't build an empire on Lynne Rossetto Kasper and Leigh Kamman.
In its present form, MPR is dead man walking -- and doesn't know it. As for the folks here bleating about MPR: Build your own damn empire. There's never been a better time.
LAMBERT: I'll just set Rob off again with this, but original information is value, and as long as MPR continues to hire reporters -- for a format that doesn't have to play Short Attention Span Theater and can discuss regenerative surgery instead of Lindsay Lohan's latest bust, it'll be a factor with a certain key demographic, i.e. discerning consumers. I agree completely that that there is far more of this style reporting to do here, and much of it should be done with an eye toward the major local corporations who sit on MPR's board, but I think demand will drive that too, in time.
Compare TPT's(public television) salaries of their 5-8 "Vice Presidents" to that of the top 6 salaries of and commercial salaries in town.
At the end of the the day, public television & radio in the TwinCities puts its money into equiptment & top staffers pockets - not content.
LAMBERT: Hmmmmm. Must check this out.
MPR has at least 10 people who made more than $200,000 in 2005. The combined salaries of the top 20 wage earners there totaled $3.6 million.
LAMBERT: We need to talk, Rob.
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff
Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson
Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Brad Zellar
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through