Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

40 Minutes from Gold

Share

Perhaps it's because I'm so NBA-centric and the Olympic team from Argentina has so many quality NBA pros on its roster (Gibobili, Scola, Nocioni, Oberto), but I always thought today's semifinal would be USA's toughest game of the tournament. And it probably was. After racing out to a huge lead that was 30-9 with six seconds left in the first quarter, Kobe Bryant and company were suckered by a zone, started clanking from three-point territory, and were a bad call away from leading by just six, after one half. (The whistle on Melo Anthony's trey--giving him three successful FTs just before the half, was questionable at best, and meant as much to the psychological flow of the game as Deron Williams's half-concluding trey did versus Australia on Wednesday.)

But two folks I've been hard on thus far this tournament--Jason Kidd and Coach Mike Krzyzewski--re-established the low-post play that was the first important step in overcoming Argentina's mediocre zone D. I counted four assists for Kidd in the pivotal third quarter alone, and all of them fed the low block--three times to Dwight Howard. It was patently obvious that Coach K had stressed banging the rock into the paint, and purposefully installed Kidd at the point to get it done in the second half. If anything, Kidd overdid it, with two or three forced and disrupted passes into Howard mixed in with the dimes. But Kidd's seven assists were five more than any other teammate, as the USA squad seemed determined to deviate from their strengths, which are athleticism and interior passing off penetration. It ain't three pointers. As Doug Collins frequently pointed out, the Red White and Blue shot from behind the arc for more than half of their attempts in the first half, and most of those came in the wretched second quarter, when Argentina outscored them 29-19 despite the fact that their star, Ginobili, was already done for the game with a bum ankle, and that Nocioni was clearly hobbled by a bad knee.

Let's name names. Kobe Bryant's disappointing tournament continued today, as he went 2-9 from beyond the arc and 3-5 from inside it. Melo likewise jacked up most of his shots from outside, going 2-8 from beyond the arc and 1-6 inside it, with the latter total mitigated by his 13-13 performance at the line (ten of those generated by tough rebounds, shooting technicals, and fouls on two-pointers). Throw in a decent 3-6 3ptFG performance by LeBron, and the USA's top three in minutes today were 7-23 from three point land, leading to the team's 10-31 from trey overall. By contrast, the squad was 22-37 from two-point range, just a whisker under 60%.

I know that shooting threes is the international game. But for the USA, it is the lazy way out. When they constantly push the tempo and look for each other underneath, good things almost always happen, and there is no team in the world talented enough to stop them merely with a packed-in zone. Did everybody see what LeBron did to the Magic, Pistons and Celtics off the dribble in the playoffs? Does anyone think Deron Williams can't get inside of the toughest zone D, either by passing or penetrating? (So why were all of D-Will's four shots from trey today?) When the USA is zipping the ball and taking it off the dribble, it naturally peps up their pressure defense by creating a predatory rhythm and flow. And that in turn leads to transition fast breaks, of which there were precious few today, despite the absence of Ginobili and the fact that Argentina committed four more turnovers than their tournment average of a dozen.

Another, related, reason for the USA second quarter doldrums was the absence of Dwyane Wade due to foul trouble. Unlike Melo, Kobe and LeBron, Wade hasn't fallen in love with the trey this tournament--he's taking it to the rack like in the vintage games of 2006. His 4-7 FG (with just 0-1 from trey) actually lowered his FG% a fair bit for the tournament.

Let's face it, Kidd is the captain in name only. I would say LeBron carries the most weight of anyone on this club, but Kobe is a close second, and outside the confines of the team, Kobe is the most prominent face of the USA Olympians. That's what makes his mediocre tournament so desultory. I'm a reformed Kobe hater. Last year's regular season turned me around on the guy. But thus far in these games, half of his shots are treys: He's made 14-45 three pointers (42 points) and 27-45 two pointers (54 points). I mean, it's not like this guy is Michael Redd, best utilized pulling up and jacking. Only Kobe Bryant can make Kobe Bryant shoot just 9 FTs in 161 minutes of Olympic action. Kobe is second on the squad in minutes and 7th in FTA, plus 9th in FG%, and 6th in assists. But he's way way ahead in three point attempts, with 15 more than Melo's second place 30. This is a guy who can usually do pretty much what he wants with the ball in his hands. And what he apparently wants to do in these Olympics is miss three-pointers.

There is some talk that Spain will naturally try to duplicate Argentina's success and deploy a zone in the Gold Medal Game on Sunday. Well, Spain has played more zone than Argentina, and, with all the injuries Argentina was dealing with, has more overall talent at its disposal. If the USA plays as stupidly Sunday as it did today, it might be a ballgame for awhile.

But I suspect that Coach K and Kidd have demonstrated to Williams and Chris Paul that attacking the zone with quickness off the dribble and interior passes is the way to go, especially since all of Spain's bigs are relatively slow. It wouldn't surprise me if Kobe and Melo keep jacking from outside, because they're ultimately alpha guys who don't want to admit mistakes or concede supremacy (which helps explain their postseason failures, by the way). It also wouldn't surprise me if one or the other got hot and the final game was a blowout, akin to the first USA-Spain tilt. But if there is one thing we all have learned thus far, it is that Coach K's crew doesn't need the three pointer to florish. No, it is superior depth, athleticism, and defensive tenacity that makes them the greatest squad ever assembled since (and perhaps including) the original Dream Teamers.

Two final thoughts: For all the talk about what a classy makeover the USA Team has done in terms of its image, all it took was one relatively close game for Melo to get in people's faces and talk smack after a hard foul on Dwight Howard. For anyone who remembers Melo's back-peddling paddycake in his last "fight," it really reinforces his punk credentials.

As one who called Luis Scola the Rookie of the Year in the NBA last season (and it was close only with Atlanta's Al Horford), I will close with my own punkish, "I told you so" in light of Scola's monster 28 point, 11 rebound performance without Ginobili to take the pressure off. We'd seen similar grit and depth of effort throughout the 2007-08 season in Houston by Scola. He was far superior to ROY Kevin Durant, a scattershot gunner on a terrible team, and will be better for the next 2-3 years to boot. The reputation of Durant, inflated by Sports Guy Bill Simmons' constant advocacy and those multi-shirted NBA ads last year, may be greater than Scola's, but if you want to win basketball games, take the Argentinian.

11 Reader Comments

Stop-n-Pop (not verified)05:40pm
Aug 22
I have one comment about this game. Throughout the entire contest all I could think of is that Kobe must be wondering how he can transplant Scola's brain into Gasol's body.
Andy G (not verified)07:18pm
Aug 22
I missed the game again, so these comments might be way off base. It doesn't surprise me that a packed-in zone slowed the US down. These guys never have to play against true zones, and most of our best players (Paul, Williams, Bryant, James, Wade) have games geared toward being unstoppable by a single defender off the dribble. When they aren't matched up one-on-one with a defender, it's probably uncomfortable and they struggle to (in three of their cases) remember what it's like to play against college defenses. It also shouldn't be a surprise that Kidd has his best game against a zone. He may have lost much of his old game, but I'm sure he can still pass with the best of them, and his game probably improves when quick passes and court vision become key priorities. It's too bad the NBA limits the use of zones. It would require more of the best players and make pro basketball more of a team game. I also think the tempo would be sped up, which is something the league office would appreciate. Scola must be really tough. I'm not sure I watched any Houston games last year, but if he's the real deal, and is surrounded by the talent that he's surrounded by...Houston will challenge for next year's trophy. Adelman is a really good offensive coach, and it seems like with Scola and Artest, the defense will always be there. It's a good thing they didn't make a panic trade of T-Mac, when some rumors were being reported. And, predictably, I'll take the bait on the Kobe-bashing. He can't be lumped in with 'Melo as having had "post-season failures." Kobe has been to the Finals 5x and won it 3x. 'Melo has never made a deep playoff run. And with respect to conceding supremacy, I was a little surprised in his most recent interview on espn.com. He was asked to pick one guy who has most impressed him on the team, and he mentioned Chris Paul and Deron Williams. Since those guys are gathering steam as recognized top-tier players, I think the "old Kobe" would have picked a more surprising answer and not given credit to guys challenging his throne as the league's best player. I guess he could have said LeBron, to whom he is more often compared, but I think he and everyone else realize the things LeBron brings to the table, and the question almost impliedly called for somebody other than James who has impressed him. Anyway, it's a small thing, but the way he said it sounded like he was truly impressed with those two guys and he talked as if they are on his level--even if he probably doesn't feel that way when he's playing against them during the season.
midlife crisis (not verified)06:53am
Aug 23
I think Kobe's performance is a reminder of Kobe's play the last year of Shaq, when he said his shot was always a good shot and played like it. It also seemed like Kobe was turning into the old Kobe during the finals, where he was no longer buying into all the friendly team player things he was spouting for part of his new image. He was not exactly supportive of his teammates, sort of like the old Jordon before he started believing in his teammates. Insert Kobe's "Colorado thing" and he still has a bit further to go to get away from his old reputation. However, he carried a flawed team to the finals, and if most of us defended KGs "post-season failures" then we shouldn't get down on Kobe's. Nobody could look at these finals with the Celtics and throw the blame on Kobe. But how do you explain his threes. Even a zone can be attacked and warped and if Jason Kidd can penetrate the zone, Kobe can, too. Frankly, I expected more out of Kobe for these games, and I have to think that if you're a Kobe fan, you probably did, too.
Andy G (not verified)10:50am
Aug 23
I was able to watch the replay of the Argentina game last night, and I didn't find anything wrong with Kobe or Melo's play. Yes, they shot threes. Most of their misses were good shots, in rhythm off a pass. Because the crowd noise was shifting in Argentina's favor and they were gaining more momentum during the stretch of missed jumpers, they seemed like bad shots. Even uglier would have been resorting to wild penetration against a sagging zone, with charges, turnovers and bad shots leading to easy transition buckets for Argentina, and foul trouble for the US. You know, something like the 2004 Team, that was always afraid to catch and shoot--even against zones. What I saw in yesterday's game, and the Spain-Lithuania game, was a lot of sagging defenders and a willingness of referees to call charges when guys force penetration. Dwayne Wade was called for one of these. LeBron could have been called for some that weren't. If every US player plays with reckless abandon, there would be an entirely new set of criticisms, and possibly a Bronze Medal game being played in tomorrow morning. As it was, Kobe and Melo shot almost as poorly as they could have, and the US cruised to a 20 point win. It's not a close game when one 2nd Quarter run that gets the game within 6 is considered a scare. I think Doug Collins said that Kobe was 11 for his last 19 or 20 3's, coming into yesterday's game. That isn't a bad percentage. He was struggling before that stretch, and had found his way out of it--until yesterday's game. Also, there is no merit to that first paragraph, unless there have been some interviews or public comments by Kobe that I haven't seen or read. He hasn't done anything in these Olympics to look selfish. The world's best scorer taking a couple too many jumpers and a couple too few drives to the basket have nothing to do with being selfish or angry at teammates. I saw him yell at a ref one time, but that was about it. And with respect to last year's Finals, I'm guessing that what he (and everyone else) was thinking about Lamar Odom's performance was a lot worse than what he did or said about it. There was nothing wrong with the way he handled himself in those games. Just because he wasn't smiling and laughing during some of those ass-kickings doesn't mean he abandoned the idea of being a team player. He was up against a better team, he worked hard in each game, he was screwed out of Game 2, and it wasn't enough. Maybe next year, he can get the 4th ring that escaped him during the Smush Era and the Bynum-less beginning to the Pau Era. Is 4 rings the threshold to be a post-season winner? It took Duncan a while to get there. Jordan, too.
Britt Robson02:15pm
Aug 23
Andy G-- I'm not going to debate Kobe's legacy because I'm not sure your defense is inaccurate--3 rings are three rings, whether Shaq is your teammate or not. And Kobe was majestic last season, right through to the Finals, when his teammates were taken away (he wasn't top notch, but that's hardly the reason they lost). On the Olympics, however, I think your pro-Kobe bias is preventing a realistic appraisal. Or, better put, we just fundamentally disagree. A missed trey that is rebounded by the opponents is actually worse than driving and missing against a sagging zone because it compels the "easy transition buckets" you cite more easily--that's Basketball 101, right? And while a charge registers a foul on the person, the USA had enough depth to incur a few if that's what it took. The point is, Kobe and Melo were a combined 4-17 from outside the arc. That's 13 possessions lost. You go on about Wade's charge and "some" that could have been called on LeBron--does that add up to 13? The USA shot nearly 60% from inside the arc, so I hardly think crazy penetration was ever the issue. Yet you totally distort the parameters of the argument, hinting darkly that had the USA engaged in "wild penetration" they might be playing for the bronze medal this weekend, while somehow claiming that even with Kobe and Melo shooting poorly, the USA won by 20, as if the easy margin had to do with the way they attacked the Argentina zone from outside. Let's get back to reality. The USA built a huge lead by playing the way they've played the entire tournament--fast, emphasizing penetration and interior passing to *then* *occasionally* set up the threes. It compelled Argentina to go to a defense they hadn't played the entire tournament, a zone, and the USA promptly launched a bevy of missed treys and committed a bunch of stupid fouls to allow their opponents back in the game. Only when the interior passing and penetration were reemphasized in the second half did the USA again pull away. If you just saw the replay then you already know this. More reality: You have no response to the numbers I laid out, showing Kobe second on the team in minutes but out of the top five in FG%, assists, and FTA. The fact that he has shot the exact same amount of twos and threes makes for an easy comparison of the effectiveness of his shot selection: 42 points off treys, 54 points off twos. I think you agree that Kobe is among the two best players on this squad. Thus, by any definition he is significantly underachieving. And please don't tell me that the blowout wins are disproportionately due to Kobe's contribution. Bottom line, the USA has been a better team when he is off the court.
Andy G (not verified)02:40pm
Aug 23
I think there's a disconnect between breaking down the shot selection of great scorers after a poor shooting performance, and the wisdom of those shots at the time they are taken. Because Kobe and Melo shot poorly, it's easy, now, to call them stupid shots and say that they should have shot more twos or driven more to the hoop. I watched the replay expecting to see a lot of contested jumpers that were of the "hold the ball for a few seconds and decide to get mine" variety. I was then surprised to see that many of them were pretty decent shots, and some came right after the rare times when Kobe did connect from outside, when he probably thought he was going to get hot. If you doubt the shooting ability of the players taking the shots, then yes, they were dumb shots. But, if they are great shooters, and I personally think they are, then a 2-3 zone will require that they take a fair amount of open jumpers. If they shoot poorly, then they'll have to win the game with defense and rebounding--two areas where the US should have just as big of an advantage as they do in scoring. You're right that I probably exaggerated what would have happened if Kobe and Melo attacked the hoop against the zone. But--the 2004 team, which I actually watched quite a bit of, had penetrators like Iverson, who did everything they could to drive into zones and had little answers for defenses that invited them to shoot. There is hardly anything easier to stop than a bunch of guards who refuse to make the defense come out and guard them. That was the '04 Team, who had much more talent than the opposition, but much less basketball sense. Even if Kobe and Melo are cold, I think the threat that they will take those shots (and usually make a higher percentage than yesterday) will open things up for other guys. A spread-out, shifting zone, will allow James and Howard to do a lot more damage around the rim than a tightly packed 2-3 will. I think everybody expects to see Spain imitating Argentina's approach, tomorrow, so it will be interesting to see what approach we take. If it's Allen Iverson and Shawn Marion all over again, the game might be closer than many expect. If it's more passing and shooting, and less dribbling, I think we'll be fine against a zone.
Brandon Hoffman (not verified)08:45pm
Aug 22
Great recap.
Captain America (not verified)08:59pm
Aug 22
Britt -- Nice recap and analysis. BTW you didn't "tell me so" cause I was nodding my head in the affirmative when you stated Luis was ROY. I'm looking forward to seeing him play this coming season. You came down hard on Kobe and Melo with some justification. Melo also was the hot head versus Argentina. It does shown a fundamental flaw in both of their game and post-season records. With so many stars (and egos) vying for ticks, it would have been nice to see Prince get more meaningful time. And I don't see CP3 jacking threes. Our sometimes Texas used car salesman, Chris Bosh, was clutch again.
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)07:44am
Aug 24
BTW: I watched the gold match this morning (late last night) and Ricky Rubio is going to be the number 1 pick in the draft next year.
pagingstanleyroberts (not verified)12:12pm
Aug 24
He's not eligible. Alexander Wolff from SI reported that in a story about him last week, and he no longer appears in nbadraft.net's mock draft for next year.
Stop-n-Pop (not verified)01:57pm
Aug 24
I'm pretty sure he's wildly off on this point. The rule is that players who did not have eligibility at a US high school need to be 19 in the calendar year in which the draft takes place. Rubio is part of what is called the International 1990 class. As long as an international player is born before Dec 31st, 2009, he's good to go in the draft. There is a clause in the collective bargaining agreement that says something about a calendar year needing to elapse between what would have been an international player's final year in high school and their entry in the draft. Rubio's class is, I believe, 08. You can read the CBA here: http://www.nbpa.com/cba_articles/article-X.php There's always the question of whether or not he will enter the draft, but he's eligible and sites like Draft Express, ESPN, and a few others correctly list him as a 2009 Draft prospect.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

A&E

Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs

Politics

Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith

Food

Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer

Sports

Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson
Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith

Retired

Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Brad Zellar
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through