Welcome to Secrets of the City, formerly rakemag.com and mnspeak.com. Learn more and submit feedback.

On the Ball

The Three Pointer: A Decent 0-2

Home Game #1: Denver 99, Wolves 91

Road Game #1  Wolves 93, New York Knicks 97

1. Egos in the Backcourt

For people who imagined that the Timberwolves might surprise the dour prognosticators and post thirty wins or more this season, it was probably a frustrating opening weekend to the 2007-08 campaign. But for those of us intrigued by the olio of young and old skill sets on this squad and how they might be sifted, culled and exposed to the harsh light of competition, it was a mostly pleasurable experience; one that indicates that our curiosity might continue to be piqued and our hoops aesthetic not completely insulted.

Or, in less lofty parlance, this team has come out of training camp pulling for each other and squeakin' their sneakers with hustle. Coach Randy Wittman doesn't seem like the clueless sideline stalker and hypocritically faux disciplinarian he portrayed last season. There's much to laud, and to wince at. Above all, the first two games were neither dull nor hopeless.

One bit of good news is that both members of the starting backcourt, Sebastian Telfair and Rashad McCants, have shown up eager to play. Unfortunately, it doesn't take much to make them forget how. Both have been hyped and hated on during their brief careers, both have recently been handed a golden opportunity (the Foye injury and the Davis trade), and both know they have a declining window of time (for Telfair it may be a matter of weeks) to justify a significant role on this team. Consequently, both find it difficult to resist the impulse to take matters into their own hands.

Their offenses aren't equal. To my mind, McCants has the bigger upside and better future, yet he's actually been a more egregious disrupter of controlled, intelligent, team basketball. During the Wolves' opening night loss to the Nuggets, Shaddy frequently drove into traffic or otherwise strove to make the great play when a mundane one, let alone good, would have better served the ballclub. The result was five turnovers, four fouls, and a lousy minus-9 in 29:47. Versus the Knicks it was more foul trouble, resulting in his disqualification halfway through the fourth period and just 22 minutes of PT overall (he was minus-2). Furthermore, Shaddy was extremely unhappy with the way the game was being called against him, and petulantly stood with his hands on his hips, not sitting down, after going to the sidelines with his sixth foul.

 Yes, the free throw disparity has been glaring--the Wolves were outshot at the line 38-19 on Friday and a whopping 39-10 tonight--and some of it is disrespect for young no-names by the refs. But McCants also isn't displaying the sort of fundamentally sound defense he often flexed last season, and that seems to happen more often when his shot if falling and he's more prominent on offense (he been 9-18 and 5-11 from the field in about 52 total minutes thus far this year). He isn't moving his feet as well and he's more apt to go for the high-risk, high-reward play like a steal, blocked shot, or taking a charge. It's not incurable, and when he does work within the flow of the offense, he's proving to be a potent scorer who may be putting some of those microfracture aftermath worries to rest, so even a slight attitude adjustment and dialing down of the ego would be benefical all the way around.

 Telfair has on balance been a pleasant eye-opener, especially compared to the prevailing opinion of his game when the Wolves first acquired him in the Garnett trade from Boston. On opening day, he did a decent job on Allen Iverson (albeit was less stellar when AI and Mike Wilks comprised a small backcourt tandem in the fourth quarter), coming up with three steals and registering a mere minus-1 in 35:17 of an eventual eight-point loss. Tonight agains the Knicks, it was seven assists and zero turnovers (for a composite 12/3 assist/turnover ratio thus far) and a nifty plus +5 in 36:58 of a four point loss.

But missed shots can be akin to turnovers, especially when you're the point guard assigned with the task of getting your more accurate shooting and advantageously matched-up teammates the rock. Telfair is a career .387 shooter who has never converted 40 percent of his heaves in any of his three NBA seasons. In the third quarter tonight he received a nice, creative feed from Al Jefferson (a rare occurrence), blew the layup, and then immaturely strained to atone by driving into traffic and hoisting an airball on the very next possession. For the season he is 8-27 FG, with no free throw attempts, in a combined 72:15 of action while Jefferson is 14-29 FG in 74:49. In other words, the bricklaying point guard is shooting at almost exactly the same frequency as the meat-and-potatoes franchise cornerstone who is supposed to be the focus, and primary locus, of the offense.

 

2. Theo The Magnificent--At One End of the Court

The Nuggets-Wolves tilt Friday night was one of the more enjoyable games performed at Target Center in recent years, and the primary entertainment was watching a pair of defensive masters, Denver's Marcus Camby and Minnesota's Theo Ratliff, ply their craft. Nobody was getting anything unscathed in the paint, and when Melo Anthony went straight at Ratliff for an attempted slam, Theo met him well above the rim and almost earned a non-call for the graceful control of the sky-wire ballet on the collision.

Ratliff owns three NBA shot-blocking titles and Camby is the reigning champ, but both also know position defense, and the subtler intimidation of looming without committing and risking a foul. Whenever one of them went to the sidelines, the other team seemed to enjoy a huge advantage, and when both rested, the incredible intensity that seemed to pervade the game mostly drained away. Except for a 31 second stint at the very end of the game, Wittman always substituted Craig Smith in for Ratliff. Smith was a team worst minus-15 in 18:12, while Ratliff was a team-best plus +7 in 29:16.

 Ratliff also seemed thoroughly integrated in the Wolves' offense on Friday, with ten FGA and a team-high 9 FTA in 29:16. It made some sense because Denver had obviously scouted Minnesota enough to know that priorities one and two were taking the ball out of Jefferson's hands, and with Camby and Najera and Nene and K-Mart, they had the guile and muscle to work the agenda. But Ratliff still seems best suited for a small modicum of touches, for a variety of reasons: At 34 and coming off back surgery (and two other operations before that), you want him conserving his energy for what he does best, which is at the defensive end of the court. Second, Ratliff is a one-year rental, and while it is wonderful to have him enable a little risk and confidence for his teammates on D, no point in habitualizing anything he does on offense. Besides, at best he is merely adequate at generating points.

After the Denver game, I asked Wittman if he called any plays for Theo. He replied that with all Ratliff contributes, he does call his number every now and then. But I think Ratliff is mature enough and cognizant enough of his own strengths and weaknesses, to understand why he'd be utilized almost completely for his defensive prowess. In any case, Theo turned the ball over four times tonight, at a time when Jefferson had turgid defender Zach Randolph guarding him. Sure, Ratliff's man Eddy Curry is equally inept on D, but the point is, Minnesota needs to establish the long and the short term habit of force-feeding Jefferson, particularly when the matchup is so skewed in his favor. Ratliff should be rewarded for running the floor, as happened tonight when he beat Curry in transition for a slam dunk, and when he's wide open because of the attention Jefferson draws. But it wouldn't bother me, or seem inappropriate, for Ratliff to adopt an offensive identity very similar to what Ervin Johnson executed during Minnesota's most successful season a few years back--as a very infrequent, but sneakily effective option when teams totally ignored him down in the paint.

But in any case, if you enjoy lunch-bucket defense from a wily, still extraordinarily wiry maestro in the paint, Ratliff is perhaps the best reason to attend a Wolves game. Catch him while he's still healthy.

 

3. Quick Hits

 Ryan Gomes got into some foul trouble guarding Melo on Friday, but he completely snuffed out Quinton Richardson against the Knicks. Richardson was scoreless in 29:53; Gomes led the Wolves with 19 points in 36:03. On the other hand, Greg Buckner looked like a world beater, and maybe a mob henchman, for the way he bodied up Melo and meted out a couple of choice fouls down near the hoop Friday. But against the Knicks, unless the Wolves' pick and roll rotations got screwed up or someone blew an assignment not apprarent to the folks in the stands, Buckner regularly got toasted off dribble penetration by Jamal Crawford.

 The learning curve for Corey Brewer looks to be long and slow. It is a tad disconcerting to see how lost the 7th pick in the NBA, a three-year collegian, looked in his first two games.

Sound observations from others: Jim Petersen commented about how sluggish the pace became when Marko Jaric subbed in as point guard for Telfair. Pete also ripped Jaric for his perpetualy whining attitude and unhappiness over his role on the team. And in media row on Friday, KFAN/Vikings/Canterbury voice Paul Allen approvingly pointed out the nastier enforcement edge the Wolves seemed to be adopting after a flagrant foul by Jaric was followed by a hard foul by Buckner.

Comments

Great stuff as always Mr. Robson. I had to break out my thesaurus a few times during this read! Interesting stats on Telfair and AL shooting about the same. It seems as if the Wolves are doomed to lead the league in fouls called against this season.
Speaking of whistles, the guy who really can't catch a break is Craig Smith. I thought most of the calls against him last year were because he was an obscure rookie, but the pattern has if anything gotten worse this year, so it must be body type and the way he plays. The only player in a Wolves uni whistled more frequently in my memory was Felton Spencer, another galoot. But Felton was much slower afoot than Smith, and wasn't trying to draw charges or defend with the subtlety Smith displays. On the flipside, traveling calls against this team are way down, post-Garnett.
Just wait until Richard gets some playing time and his fouls/min will rival those of Smith. About the article, I like what you wrote, and I agree with a lot of what you wrote. Telfair has improved from his first few seasons on the decision-making front (though he had two lapses in the Denver game), but definately still needs work on his shooting. Like other people have said on the ESPN boards, a three-guard rotation of Foye, McCants, and Telfair would be nice to see this season. The best part about it would be that Jaric is out of the equation and hopefully the offense doesn't get bogged down. Buckner would still get time for defensive reasons, but hopefully they would all get around 30 minutes. Ratliff and Walker are annoying to watch on the offensive end, but for different reasons. I really wish Green was put in the game instead of Walker at the end of the game - because recent history has shown what Walker will do if he thinks he's open or if the situation requires someone to take a shot... clank. Green at least has a good shooting stroke, even if he's clueless in just about every other aspect. On the other hand, Ratliff has energy on the offensive end, but sometimes it's like he believes that he has to prove to everyone that he's healthy and can do the things he did before. Really needs to lower the frequency of his shots and quit trying to do much more than getting putbacks and taking it to the rim. It's not just Telfair taking looks away from Jefferson, it's Ratliff with his little 5-8 footers. Brewer looks like he has no confidence when he's on the floor, totally unlike what he did at Florida, in the SL, and in preseason. I hope he can regain his form. Again, good read Briit.
Casper-- I thought Walker had a great first rotation in the first half of the Denver game. Since then, well, there are glimpses of good things, like him taking a charge on the water buffalo Nene, and bad things, like his ill-advised trey to make or break the Wolves in the final seconds last night. When Witt summoned Walker to make the inbounds, I thought, that's good coaching, getting the vet to execute the pass and avoid the steal. But I never dreamed a dude languishing on the bench most of the night would take it upon himself to chuck it up, especially since the squad was a gaudy 60% (9-15) from outside the arc at the time.
Can we make "Theo The Magnificent" his official nickname?
Question: I've missed all but the last 5 minutes of game 2, so I'm woefully uninformed. But, how has Wittman responded to McCants's defensive lapses? Has he allowed him to play through them, has he pulled him from the game? p.s.: This is likely caused by my relatively low capacity for rational thought, but I must admit that I'm relatively confused by the CAPTCHA system. I understand the point, but I'm having trouble determining whether or not my comment has been published, etc. Oh, well.
Nate-- Witt has been patient with McCants, to the point where he defended him after Friday's game when an irascible Pat Reusse asked him about Shaddy's turnovers. He also exercised such a long leash vis a vis fouls that McCants picked up his 6th just six minutes into the 4th quarter. And your CAPTCHA negotiations went fine--I empathize.
Sorry for latching onto the side topic, but I want to add 2 cents on the new format of this site: I like the CAPTCHA, but I don't like that comments are now placed below the comment you reply to instead of having them all in order of when they were posted. I periodically check back to the main page to see if there are new comments. Before, if there were new ones, I could scroll to the bottom and avoid spending time looking through those I'd already read. Now a new post might be somewhere in the middle. The annoyance caused by this will be directly proportional to the number of comments in a given thread. Also, is there a way to become verified?
Yeah, I agree on the threading-comments thing - I like to skip to the comment I read last and continue from there. It's a little annoying to scroll through the entire thread to see if anything else is new. I do like it because sometimes I do want to reply to individual comments rather than write some massive missive relating to every topic posted (because I seriously can't resist adding my two cents sometimes). I'm definitely willing to live with the Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart in exchange for getting a comment instantly posted.
I enjoyed your article Britt, but I encourage you to further take to task the officiating in both of these games. Both were games in which the wolves played as well or better than the opposing team and both were games we should have won. The rebounding margins, low turnovers, and amount of banging in the paint by this team is refreshing, and have been the things keeping us in games despite the pathetic calls being made by the officials. I agree that to some extent the young wolves have been too defensively aggressive which has hurt our chances in some games, but the frequency with which Jamal Crawford or Starbury would run into the paint wildly and create some minimal amount of contact only to be rewarded with a foul call stood in stark contrast to the treatment the wolves were receiving. The free throw discrepancy was disgusting and the blame rests almost entirely at the feet of the officials in these games. The wolves are a good team this year and they played tough in both games but they are not good enough to overcome the tandem of the other team and the officials. Its calls like the ones in the past two games that present damning evidence on the efficacy and fairness of NBA officiating and tempt me to find a different sport to watch.
As one of the few members of the 40-win bandwagon, those were 2 very painful, albeit expected losses. I'm impressed with the Telfair / McCants combo so far, but I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop - while I'd like 40 wins this year, we're going to have to see how these kids handle an extended losing streak. Some of the ex-Boston guys were around for their 18-game streak last year, and there's not a Paul Pierce to bail us out this time - I hope we go into each and every game aggressively, and that the level-headed Foye is the Yin to Shaddy and Telfair's Yang. Theo is money and I'm already hoping he can stay here, even though he would fit perfectly with Boston or any other contender next year. I also really like what Gomes brings on both ends of the floor, but I wouldn't say shutting down Quentin (career 40% shooter) is any sort of feather in his cap. I'm not worried at all about Brewer - the game is much faster at this level, and playing against guys with significant experience in the NBA will get him into the flow soon, just have some patience. And can we temper our expectations on the guy just a little? From what I've read here and elsewhere, Wolves fans are lumping him with Foye and Jefferson, saying that he's a future cornerstone of this team. But he's 6'8" and 185 pounds. And a rook. And we KNEW his offensive game was "unpolished" when we drafted him. He's going to have trouble with contact until he is able to bulk up more, and until that happens, he's going to get bullied and play scared, just like most rooks at this level. I'm personally not expecting real production out of him until after the all-star break (though hopefully improvement will come sooner). Regarding our achilles heel (free throws), I don't see any guys looking to draw contact - Bassy clearly fears it (0 FT attempts on 27 shots), Rashad is shooting jumpers, and while Al is capable of faking out his defender, he doesn't seem to be interested in creating contact. Hopefully getting to the line is where Foye will come in and turn this team around, but it's one of those things that successful guards should be able to do. Also, congrats to AP on his record day...like a hot throwing star through butter. It was really fun to watch, and if he could do that without our offense even pretending to throw a pass...let's get a vet QB next season and go for it all! Our D ain't gettin' any younger! And this morning, I just received the coolest T-shirt I think I've ever owned (click my name for link).
I'm not sure what we should expect of Brewer this year. Here's a guy that was ideally suited to the college game - where there's more pure teamwork, and no particular skill necessary to stand out - with limited specific skills offensively, and on the lean side for the pro game. Now, he's on a substandard team with a coach trying to prove himself, and all kinds of similar guys trying to figure out if they know how to play, or at least play together. So, his weaknesses are more evident. He's going to be a long learning project, unless he suddenly learns how to shoot. As for Telfair and McCants showing up eager to play, well, yeah, I'd hope so, I'd think it's the price of admission at his level, and on this team in particular, given the wide open opportunity for someone - anyone - to be a savior. The clock is ticking on Telfair - unless he straightens himself out he's one step from starting in Europe. Everyone's hustling and eager in the first few weeks of the season, so we'll check on the character in a month or so. For now, nice to see Ratliff working it with the basics. How long can he hold up?
I'm understanding the draft choice less and less. If there were questions about Brandon Wright and his hustle, and there are questions about Brewer with his size and offensive game, don't you go with the 7 foot guy who has questions? I'm intrigued by the backcourt, too, but I want to see them close out a game. In fact, it's hard for me to watch the first three quarter because of my 4th quarter expectations.
Midlife, My opinion: In NBA, almost everyone is incredibly talented. Often,the difference between a successful long NBA career and short disappointing NBA career is a player's work ethic. If my opinion is true, then Brewer is a good pick over Wright. There are a lot of questions about Wright's work ethic and maturity. Brewer works incredibly hard. Of course, if hard work was all it took to make it in the NBA, we'd all be All-stars. Talent is a big issue as well. But Brewer is extremely athletic and is already very strong for his size. I think he'll get stronger and that his jump shot will improve (because he'll work on it, constantly). The guy is a true professional and I really believe he'll be a solid contributor down the road. If Wright figures it out and matures, as they say you can't teach 7 feet. But Wright's a high-risk guy because he's shown little toughness on or off the court. [He didn't rebound well in college and provided little effort on defense and doesn't have a good "motor", as they say.] Of course, Wright's not the only other option. The Wolves could have also selected Noah, Brewer's teammate. But, I think we can all agree that the kid deserves a lot more time to figure things out before we really question the pick.
Regarding Brewer...I was screaming for the Wolves to trade up for Horford last spring, and I questioned Brewer's ball handling, shooting, and paper thin build. But since, we obviously didn't make the trade and had #7, I think Brewer was the right pick. If he can work on his shot and put on 15-20lbs over the next few years, I think he could be the next Bruce Bowen (minus the dirty plays). I am impressed with his work ethic, his athleticism, and his attitude. His upside is very big if he can add bulk and work hard.
I wish my biggest problem in life was needing to bulk up. My ongoing battle with the scale is in the other direction. Sounds like Theo will be wearing a suit tonight. If I'm Wittman and Maddog would have sat tonight absent a sick Theo, I think I'd give Richard the nod tonight and see what he can do in spots. Any chance Gomes moves to the 4 and Al to the 5?
Two games into the season and people are already questioning the draft pick for Brewer? Here is what I'm not worried about. Brewer's paper thin build. Brewer's shooting Brewer's dribbling Brewer's work-ethic Here is what I am worried about. Brewer's smile. Brewer reminds me of Sprewell. They are both wiry and paper thin. They both came into the league touting defensive skills with offensive skills still not fully developed. They were both very athletic, hard working and intelligent basketball players. Spreewell was extremely quick in his prime and developed a very effective mid-range jumper to go with his slashing style over time. Despite his thin build, Spreewell had deceptive strength to go with his athletic abilities. I think Brewer shares many of these traits, but lacks Spreewells scowl. I'd like to see some meanness get into Brewers game. He'll never be able to physically prevent a Melo from getting to the basket, so he has to learn to punish him in other more subtle ways. He'll have to learn to extend those bony elbows and appendages pecisely into opposing bodies where they can be felt the most. MElo may be able to run Brewer over, but he'll take a sharp elbow to the bicep or boney knee to the thigh if he does that will make him think twice if he tries it again. These subtle defensive skills take some meanness in his game that I'm not sure Brewer has, but I hope Wittman or McHale can help develop. Replace Brewer's smile with Spreewell's scowl and we will have an all-star.
Andy - I will tweak your good point about Brewer. Imagine if you grew up having little but the love of your family and found yourself a rookie in the NBA. I know I'd have a goofy smile plastered on my face most every minute. For Corey's smile to last a long time, he needs to toughen his game, no doubt. But let's not discourage youthful joy too much. It sure beats "feed my family" petulence.
A.K., Absolutely! Don't get me wrong, I love Brewer as a person. I love his story. And, I often questioned the sanity of Sprewell - still do. But, Brewer could probably be a more effective NBA player if he developed a little meanness to his game - a little smashmouth. You can be skinny and still play smashmouth you just have to use your elbows and your brains. That's my only point. I don't want Brewer to lose his enthusiasm for NBA basketball. I think a little smashmouth might get him the respect and confidence he needs to go with his lofty selection in the 2007 draft. Once he places one of those elbows right where Melo, Lebron, or Kobe least want it, then he'll get the respect and confidence he needs to play the NBA game and , then he can smile all he wants. A smile on his face with Manu Ginobili doubled over right after Ginobili drives the lane initiating contact with Brewer only to take a well-placed Bony Brewer Knee to the groin, is the deranged smile I most want to see on Brewer's face.
I have confidence that Brewer can eventually show a nasty side, but you've really gotta have the skills first, and those are clearly a work in progress. It's hard to make a living at the SG/SF spot simply by being a hardnosed physical player ala Bowen, who also has a 3-ball in his arsenal. Also, mad props to Britt for getting linked by TrueHoop, one of the best basketball blogs out there (even if ESPN owns it now!). I sent Henry a polite email informing him that I had sent a couple of emails when Britt wrote particularly good stuff, so his "nobody told me about Britt" excuse is null and void!
True Anton, And, my contention would be that Brewer has the skill set to be successful. Certainly more potential to have a greater impact than Bowen and that saying enough right there. A three point threat would be a significant addition to his arsenal, but not necessary to be an effective or even an All Star SG/SF in the league. He should work on a high percentage mid-range shot and driving to the hoop first. From what I have seen of him, he has the athletic ability and a good enough stroke to develop this aspect of his game. But, really, we haven't seen enough to project him as an All star or to write off his selection at the seven slot in last summers draft. Either opinion is premature at the moment. What he has shown in the first two game is that he appears physically overmatched and that his ball handling skills are suspect. He doesn't need to handle the ball much if the ball is in the hands of a point guard capable of directing the offense and getting it to him when he can be most effective - about 10-16 ft from the basket and matched up one-on-one with his man. He has the skill-set to be a good slasher and mid-range shooter. How far he goes with that we can only wait and see. My only point is that being physically over-matched by bigger and stronger SG/SF might be overcome with a dose of nastiness to his game.
Back to AK's original point--yeah, I'd toy with Jefferson and Gomes at the 5/4 if Orlando continues using Howard at center and Rashard Lewis as the "power forward." Put it this way: It is a no-brainer to stick Gomes on Lewis regardless of position. Who else on the roster stays with him-- Buckner? 'Toine? And if Theo's out, they are going to need Richard to give Jefferson a breather on Howard. For that matter, activate Doleac and let him bang on D and lure Howard out with that surprisingly sweet 15-footer he possesses.
http://www.startribune.com/blogs/wolves/?p=18 According to Jerry Zgoda, Theo is expected to start tonight. So I assume Doleac will dress, Richard, Maddog and Foye will be inactive.
I just want to add a comment on KG and Boston's 2-0 start in Boston. They handily beat Washinton on Friday Night and then pulled out a sqeaker against Toronto on Sunday. The season is long and the minutes tell the story for the aging trio. They were all near 40 minutes in the 20 point win against the Wizards and in the squeaker against Toronto Allen went 49.1, Pierce goes 45.3 and KG plays 43.6 minutes. These three might lead the league in minutes played if stay healthy. If it takes each of them to play 40 minutes a night to have a chance to win they will be shot by seasons end.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.