It is past time for another Twins diablog, ostensibly round three in an ongoing conversation about the state of the hometown nine, with participants including yours truly, Warning Track Power blogger and Rake staffer Brad Zellar, and sports maven freelance writer David Brauer. We had similar bits just before the season started and over Memorial Day.
This time it is a bit truncated, in that I made my first post to Zellar and Brauer yesterday afternoon, in between the Twins 1-0 loss on Tuesday and their 3-2 loss on Wednesday. Zellar responded late last night after covering the game at the Dome, and Brauer is currently M.I.A. but will probably speak his mind in the comments section. Same thing goes for my subsequent posts on the subject, and hopefully Zellar's, and hopefully yours.
For the record, my proposal for the Twins to start retooling for next year is hardly a surprise, given my ongoing belief that the team just didn't have enough to contend this season anyway. But Zellar, perhaps in the throes of post-game depression (he does live and die with the Twins on a pretty visceral level), raised at least my eyebrows by proposing, or perhaps just entertaining, a thorough housecleaning.
Read on and then toss in your two cents...
Britt Robson
Fish or cut bait? That's the question facing the Twins on July 18, 93 games into the season, when they are seven back of Detroit and six behind Cleveland with 69 to play. If the Tigers played a smidgen above .500 the rest of the way (36-35), the Twins would have to go 42-27--a higher winning percentage than any current MLB team possesses--just to tie them. And even then, Cleveland would have to also descend into mediocrity rather than continue on with their current status quo.
Obviously I'm in favor of cutting bait. And that means dealing Torii Hunter for the best prospect(s) the team's notoriously wise scouting system can identify.
Before continuing on, it is time for me to eat a little crow on Hunter. I have kept waiting for him to come back to earth and be the dunderheaded free-swinging, guess-oriented, unclutch hitter I've come to know and suspect. But after more than a year now of quality at-bats and solid run production, it is time to believe Hunter's pronouncements of maturity. In last night's excruciating shutout loss to Detroit, Hunter was 0-2 with a lefty on the mound in a scoreless game--exactly the kind of situation when he used to go for broke (and be broken). But four straight times he ignored the meanandering nibbles from Nate Robertson and drew the walk. Bravo. And while his defense may have slipped just a titch, it is still close to Gold Glove-caliber.
The problem isn't with Hunter's current production, it is what he'll command on the free market, especially in terms of contract length. Today happens to be Torii's 32nd birthday. He is going to be offered a contract with a minimum of five years on it for a minimum of $75 million. If the Twins do a deal that pays a 37-year old outfielder at least $15 million in 2012, how much are Justin Morneau, Johan Santana and Joe Mauer worth at that time? Or forget about 2012; if anyone thinks Morneau and Santana aren't a tad curious about how the Hunter situation works out, they're the same starry-eyed lovelies who think the return of Rondell White will happen, let alone help. You give Hunter a fat contract and you simply can't keep both Morneau and Santana.
At least Hunter's biggest media cheerleader, the Strib's Jim Souhan, understands this. When I was on the radio with him late last month, he strongly intimated that Hunter is a greater priority than Santana, on the standard line that Hunter plays every day but Santana is one out of five. As someone who would like to blame either the ganja or the tequila for my deranged opinions on the Orioles Eric Bedard soon eclipsing Santana as the premiere pitcher in the American League (in the comments section of Brad's Warning Track Power blog), I disagree with Souhan. But even so, Souhan's argument is strengthened by the surfeit of pitching prospects in the Twins minor league system and the total absence of quality outfield candidates.
But back to the original, overriding topic. There is always the possibility that the Twins will neither fish nor cut bait, but simply play out the string this season without an attempt to upgrade in either the short-term or long-term with new personnel. In fact, Terry Ryan's temperament and past history would indicate that's the most likely outcome. I think I'm on record in the last two roundtables as saying that if the team does indeed intend to challenge for the AL Central crown, they clearly need a bat, and the season thus far reinforces that view. Does anybody envision Ryan renting a dangerous bat in exchange for one of his precious pitching prospects?
That's why Hunter needs to be dealt, as soon as possible, while his value is still high. And I'd also flip Luis Castillo for a solid prospect. Ditto Rincon or, more plausibly, Matt Guerrier, because a boatload of contenders need bullpen help. I think the Twins have proven that their coterie of scouts assess talent as well or better than any club in baseball. Stockpiling some promising pieces and making a run next year, when all of their key pieces will be another year deeper or nearer their primes, is the smart way to go.
Brad Zellar
It's always viewed as heresy to trade a good player in his prime, but, like most heresies, the long view usually makes the actual act look, at the worst regrettable, and at best, much ado about nothing.
When you think about the great fleecings in Major League history you're usually talking about a decent or even great player being traded for a bunch of guys who nobody'd much heard of at the time. The Pierzynski trade, for instance. And, yeah, I know there are exceptions, but they're actually pretty rare. What I'm saying is that after the fact you generally remember the guys you'd never heard of at the time --Jeff Bagwell, for instance, or Joe Nathan, or Francisco Liriano.
I think Torii Hunter is as good as he's ever going to get. All available evidence--and there's a lot of it--suggests that he's at the age where decline is inevitable, and can be marked. He's sure as hell not worth how much it's now going to cost to keep him. I still believe the Twins erred in not moving him before this year. At this point he becomes a rent-a-player, and savvy as Minnesota's scouting people might be, they're still not in the bargaining position they would have been a year or two ago, so I don't realistically have any idea what the hell they could get for him --or, for that matter, who the hell they'd play in his absence.
That said, I don't see any way they can keep him beyond this year, not after Ichiro's contract.
And the Twins obviously have bigger questions beyond the hole Hunter would leave. They also have other (big) fish to fry in the budget department. Everybody talks about Morneau and Santana in the same breath as Hunter, but there's also the Mauer contract to consider, and the situations of Joe Nathan, Michael Cuddyer, and, now, Pat Neshek.
After tonight's (Wednesday night's) one-run loss to the Tigers, which cost the Twins another game in the standings and provided the latest indicator that this just isn't a team built to contend right now, it seems plenty apparent that Terry Ryan and company need to recognize that their real job at the moment is providing a better supporting cast for their young stars and up-and-coming arms. The farm system might be stocked with pitching, but there's virtually nothing in the way of offensive help on the horizon, and offensive help is what this team desperately needs.
Terry Ryan has done a terrific job, but it's times like this that I wish we had a different, even more reckless, general manager. And along those lines, here's some serious heresy: how much could the Twins get for Johan Santana on the open market right now? A lot, I'm supposing, a shit load. Particularly if they can think creatively (and rationally) enough to recognize that by trading him they're essentially freeing up hundreds of millions of salary down the road.
It would hurt, sure, but how many pitchers of Santana's caliber manage to just keep doing it year in and year out? He already has a lot of innings under his belt --this year should mark the fourth straight season of 200+ innings-- and, yeah, he has great mechanics and is in terrific condition, but pitching is hell on the human arm, and the odds overwhelmingly suggest that he's due at some point in the next two or three years to run into some arm trouble.
Already this season we've seen him laboring in unaccustomed fashion. His fastball isn't quite what it used to be, and some of the inflated pitch counts and prolonged at bats we've seen this year are an indication of that. The 15-pitch at bat Carlos Guillen (in which he fouled off ten of Santana's pitches) had in the fourth inning of tonight's game was the sort of thing we've seen more often this year than in any other season.
Very, very few pitchers ever end up justifying gigantic, long-term, guaranteed contracts. It's just the reality of the game, and the Twins aren't the sort of team that's in a position to gamble on the durability and continued excellence of a starting pitcher, no matter how good he might presently be. They've got pitchers. They got more pitchers coming. What they need right now, and into the future, are some guys who can hit the fucking ball.
All right, I'm just in a hog-wild, if-I-ran-the-zoo frame of mind (those last couple games will do that to a guy), but if you put any stock at all in Billy Beane's philosophy you likely wouldn't hesitate to unload Joe Nathan to the highest bidder and install Neshek in his place.
Neshek has been phenomenal, he clearly has stones, and he's got the nasty stuff and freak-show intangibles to be a closer.
Closers are overrated: look at the guy who was on the mound for the Tigers at the end of the game tonight (Todd Jones) --he's wearing his eighth different Major League uniform, had a brief stint with the Twins, and is on his second go-round with Detroit.
Or look at Joe Borowski in Cleveland. Or Francisco Cordero in Milwaukee.
Also, yes, absolutely, go ahead and see what you can get for Castillo and Rincon. The Twins can call up Alexi Casilla and throw him out there at second or third --he can swap around the rest of the year with Punto and Rodriguez.
I'd hang onto Guerrier, just because the guy has been so tremendous this year after being forced into a bigger role in a pinch. But if the organization has shown one consistent knack over the years, it's the ability to find and groom guys just like Guerrier (and Neshek, and, for that matter, Rincon).


I'm willing to admit I'm wrong when I'm wrong. I've read the posts, and I was wrong to ridicule Rondell. He is clearly what this team needs to solidify our DH position, and finally fill that gaping 7-hole that's kept this team from flourishing. You go, Rondell . . .
First of all, I'd just like to point out that Rondell hit .351 in the months of September and October last year. Yes, he's clearly injury-prone and, as the mutual fund ads say, past performance is no guarantee of future results. I'm just sayin'...
It sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I'm squarely in the "keep fishin'" camp. We have the best pitcher in baseball, a batting champ who plays a hard-to-find position, and an MVP for a first baseman. Castillo is a good leadoff hitter, Torii has exceeded my expectations (and is a great glue guy), and Cuddyer has also played well up to his current injury. Yes, baseball is a sum-of-parts ordeal where we need everyone to contribute, but our big three is more than capable of shouldering a heavy load. I say we're just a Radke and Stewart away from being in the middle of the AL Central race, right?
In this regard, losing Torii would be huge, but if we can get a "now" starting pitcher for him (hopefully someone who will be around for a couple more seasons), get Liriano back next year (though I'm keeping my expectations low on this one), and do "slightly more than usual" offseason tinkering, I don't see why we can't compete this year and for years to come.
Oh, and if we can't/won't move Torii, just let him walk at the end of the season if we're not going to sign him...let me cheer for him for awhile longer. Click my link for a nifty article on how different types of NBA fans watch games - it relates to baseball as well.
Moroni-
It's not so much the walks that make castillo a valuable leadoff hitter, but it's his long at bats. Perhaps Mauer would be a good leadoff hitter in that respect, but he lacks all of the other typical leadoff tools. Maybe if Alan Trammel could bat cleanup for detroit back in the 80s, we can have a catcher bat leadoff here.
Midlife,
Looking beyond the average one quickly sees that Castillo will be one of the easiest players to replace in the lineup. I have nothing against the guy but he draws few walks and hits for no power making his .300 average a very empty offensive statistic.
" . . . Help is Coming" today's Strib headline screams. Alas and alack, it turns out the "long-awaited player" is actually Rondell White. Could I get a quick show of hands for those long-awaiting the coming of Rondell White . . . Anyone? Anyone?
It's a sad state of affairs when we need to add a couple players (DH & 3rd) and have Liriano come back to be a great team, but instead we're looking at all the players we will potentially trade away. I know this sounds like a repeat of the KG discussion, but losing our talent does not guarantee a return to dominance. Rather, it is more likely to drop us into the cellar for a long time.
Losing Castillo, which many consider is a foregone conclusion, is a disaster. We no more have a backup lead off hitter than we do a centerfielder to take Torii's place. If anyone remembers the days before Shannon Stewart (who wasn't much of a leadoff hitter himself), it's actually a pretty useful guy to have in your lineup.
The problem with deciding on our core, and just filling in the blanks, is that we have the same $ problems with fill ins that we did when we didn't retain our players. If any of our guys walk (with the exception of Nathan), we are hosed when it comes to replacing them.
Torii Hunter for Mike Cameron for the Padres.
The Padres are in contention, and need punch in the lineup. They seem like a decent candidate to be able to resign Torii.
Cameron is a proven veteran. he gives us solid production for, say, a number six hitter. And no significant dropoff in centerfield play (with all due respect to Torii.)
I love Torii. And yes, this is trading down, but this way, we don't get burned when Torii walks.
I can be counted in the sanguine camp along with Britt. Garza is a stud, Liriano is a phenom, Baker, Bonser, Slowey, and perhaps Perkins can all be above average starters. I have full confidence the Twins will keep drafting quality pitchers, and perhaps the solution to our hitting holes is trading veterans prior to their free agent departure.
Trading Torii to raid another team for an outfielder and third baseman seems like a wise move. Torii WILL be overpaid by someone. My guess is the Twins are comfortable in offering around 60 million for 4 years. Torii's market value will be somewhere in the range of 5 years, 90 million. That's too much money for an aging, injury-prone CF. As much as Torii likes to bag on other Twins (mostly Mauer) for not playing through injuries, he has missed over 100 games the last three years, and he isn't worth more than 15 million a season. The Twins had a chance to sweep the Tigers if a hit would have fallen in a key spot, those hit didn't fall and Britt's numerical analysis is spot on, coming back from the deficit we have is highly unlikely. We need to cut bait this year and hope Johan will sign an extension for well below market value this summer or I'll probably be in the trade Johan camp next summer (even if we're in the race, Johan's market value will be 7 years, 175 million dollars).
As for old Carl "Mr. Burns" Pohlad, I'll never understand why the league's richest owner wouldn't spend a little coin to bring a championship to the TC prior to his imminent death. You can't take it with you, Carl. Something tells me the family will avoid financial crisis if we bumped the payroll 20 million a year.
Anyone know the rule regarding a runner being hit by a thrown ball, not intentionally getting hit, but not getting out of the way? Morneau had the right to be in the basepath, I was confused why he was immediately called out in the rundown, he didn't move into the throw, he just didn't get out of the way. Curious play.
Thank you all for your rational, well thought-out comments. Really. Whether I agree with them or not, they're a far cry from the mass hysteria and name-calling on some of the blogs. Other sites I read make me want to cry. This one makes me think, but isn't depressing to read.
Interesting trivia re: Boston. As a team, they've scored just 11 more runs than the Twins. PS: both teams are in the top 10 league-wide, and in the top half of the AL (Boston fourth, Twins seventh).
The best case that can be made for moving the BoSox up my rankings is that their offense has, if anything, underperformed. The club is in the top 10 batting, fielding and pitching.
Britt, my heart is not at issue here. The Tigers have moved up in my affections since they acquired Sheff (a point I lauded in our pre-season discussion), but I'd probably favor Cali and Seattle if it were just up to my heart.
I don't pay attention to the NL. It is, as Andy McPhail once said of the Saints, a beer league. But with only the M's an upstart among the AL chosen, it is fun to see teams like the Brew Crew and D-backs winning young.
As for Brad's query, there's nothing wrong with a core of Mauer, Morneau and Cuddy (for his D as well as his O). It seems Bartlett is now a player who's fun to watch, though he appears to be a bit injury-prone. We're, gulp, a centerfielder away from being solid long-term up the middle (I do dread seeing Coco Crisp in center next year after we trade Torii to the BoSox). Pitching seems good enough - three solid starters next year, young guys solidifying the late inning pen, and hanging on to Nathan, despite his mild regression this year. (We do get some benefit from Torii's departure, to be spent on guys like Nathan.)
It's really a question of smart free-agent acquisitions in the sub-Torii range. Again, I'm not as sanguine as Britt, but it's far from hopeless.
I was serious about my suggestions, but I was also just fooling around. What chaps my ass about the way this team has been run --and the year-in and year-out static and hand wringing-- is that the Pohlads are in a financial position to spend whatever the hell they want to make this team better (you think all that money George Steinbrenner spends is strictly Yankee revenue? Think again. The guy has serious ego invested in the team, and that more than anything else is what drives his spending). There should never be a doubt --there never has *been* any doubt-- that no matter what they spend Carl Co. is going to find a way to make money on their investment down the road. They already have, in spades. It's just never enough.
That said, I've never had any respect for the way Steinbrenner does business, and I'm certainly not suggesting that Pohlad play *that* game.
There is a middle ground, though, and it's still pricey. Don't just throw money out the window, but keep the players your organization develops and spend the money to give those guys the supporting cast necessary to win. At the same time, there are going to be occasions when you have to make hard, rational decisions: how much money do you want to fork over to a guy who's entering the back stretch of his career, and could that money be more wisely invested in a player or players with fewer miles on the odometer, and/or who can address some of your glaring needs?
I think the answer to that last question is yes, but who are those players? Where are they? How can you get them in a Minnesota uniform (and in a hurry)?
As much as it makes sense to retool and rebuild the roster around the young kids for next year and beyond, this essentially means rebuilding around unproven pitchers and Mauer and Morneau.
How long is this rebuilding process going to take and will we get anyone back that gives Mauer and Morneau even a chance to win? Thats only two bats in the lineup.
One thing you have to give the Twins Marketing directors and the Pohlads credit for is the Small Market campaign has lowered everyone's expectations. No way we can sign Santana and Hunter and still keep the two M's. And what about Cuddyer? Castillo? Nathan?
I can see losing a couple and I might even be in favor of a trade. But, were building a new stadium. You make trades and sign players to make better teams. I don't want to buy the idea that we are not going to sign -players because we can't afford them since we are a small market team. i think its a load of crap. Its a small truth that has become a big excuse for keeping the Twins an extremely profitable investment for the Pohlads instead of just a profitable investment. Just like the newspaper industry - right guys?
Kleiner makes a very good point about the rent-and-resign scenario. If we're going to toss plates of dough at Hunter (and I still don't think Terry Ryan will change his spots that dramatically), then at least get a prospect for a meaningless 65 game absence.
David, you're conflating rooting interests and handicapping on me. For example, I think the Red Sox and Angels have the best shot at coming out of the AL--the Tigers bullpen will doom them against potent postseason lineups--but I'm not sure how much I want to root for the boorish Red Sox nation (and I say that as someone reared in Massachusetts until I left for college) despite my fondness for Manny's inscrutability and Okajima's newfound miraculous changeup. I love the way Mike Scioscia manages a game and think that John Lackey (who goes tonight in the Dome) is the most underrated starting pitcher in major leagues baseball (behind Eric Bedard, of course).
But my favorite teams are in the NL, beginning with the Brewers. I mean, Ryan Braun is the best pure rookie (meaning non-Japanese, I guess) since Albert Pujols, and Prince Fielder is a joy to watch. Between Fielder and Johnny Estrada, they've got the brats-and-beers physique of the populace down pat. Too bad about the recent injury to Sheets, but I love the kid Gallardo and the crafty lefty Capuano and the steady Dave Bush (working hard to unbesmirch that last name) can usually get it to that formidable bullpen (though I do fear Derrick Turnbow going el gasolino in the playoffs).
Another team I like is the Arizona Diamondbacks, despite the way they screwed the league (via loans and bad financial management) while capturing their ring a few years back. They too have wonderful kids, even if Conor Jackson and Carlos Quentin (now in the minors) have taken large steps backwards. The NL West race is actually even more fun than the AL Central, with the Padres owning baseball's best pitching staff (it isn't even close), the Dodgers executing a great strategy of small ball (Furcal and Pierre) and aging vets (Kent, Gonzo, Nomar) plus young stud Russell Martin for their offense, and the old Reds method of mashing opponents with their bullpen (Beimel/Broxton/Saito). Then you've got the Diamondbacks and the emerging Rockies.
Teams I don't like: The Cubs. The Cardinals. The Rockies. The Yankees.
Tommy Herr. Heh. One of the most-hated Twins - by many diehards - but for me, because it cost us the namesake of the Tom Brunansky Baserunning Cup, given to the worst baserunning Twin each annum. (Past winners include Johnny Moses, who I once saw get forced at first on the back end of a double play just as he was coming around to "score," and Michael Cuddyer in the "early years".)
OK, I'm back in the discussion. And I've been a "cut bait" guy all year. I'm sorta-glad for the sweep ... I mean, this team has defined .500 ball all season. Case in point: second game of the Tigers series, tough pitchers duel, Tigers up 3-2, bases loaded, two outs and up steps ... Lou Ford, the 2007 winner of the What's He Doing In the Bigs Anymore Anyway? (recent winner: Matthew LeCroy.) Weak flyout to center, inning and game over.
I am not a guy who believes in trading pitching - despite the prevailing anti-Terry wisdom and ESPN's recent column opining that prospects are now overrated. I've long advocated Hunter's trade - a twinged hammy only heightens my ardor. The biggest merde about such a move is that it will give Twins pitchers one less reason to live - the oft-mentioned you-lose-Torii-you-lose Johann analysis (and I think there is a heighted chance of this, definitely).
When Hunter goes, it will be with my respect. When Castillo leaves - and yes, it's time to trade him, too - I'll cry a little. What a solid ballplayer! In retrospect, it makes me like those Teal Champions from the late '90s a bit more. And he deserves to play on grass and he faces his Pasture Years. The loss of Castillo AND Hunter is why I'm not as sanguine about the Twins as Britt.
While others are looking at Hunter, I look at Ford. And Tyner. And Cirillo. And Rodriguez. This is probably the crappiest undercard of Twins in the Pretty-Successful Era. I don't know if other teams are aping Ryan's (temporarily former) skills at finding bench/platoon guys, but if Hunter goes, it's a very reasonable expectation to say "eschew the star" (after all, we still have the lefty-rightie-lefty core of Mauer, Cuddie and Morneau), and find us more Dan Gladdens and Chili Davises (not to mention Tom Brunanskies). Even if that's aiming a bit high - two of those guys came in trades, and I'm already on record for holding on to prospects unless they lack the whiff of Kyle Lohse about them - it's one of Ryan's failings. I can excuse it with Carl's payroll and Torii here, but next year, there's no excuse.
Just to update the Diablog thread: I sucked donkey weiner on the Indians (but have consistently picked Detroit #1 and see no reason to change), but was right on on Rincon, this year's winner of the J.C. Romero Washed Up But Doesn't Know It Trohpy. (One of the season's most enjoyable I told you so's was when the Red Sox cut or J.C.). As Britt (I think) noted, there might be some tradeables in the bullpen - but we have to go strong pitching with our dismal bat forecast.
By the way, let's talk rooting interests now that the home squad has made itself redundant:
My AL strength-o-meter sez:
First tier:
1. Angels
2. Tigers
Second tier:
3. Indians
4. M's
5. BoSox
Team that has improved greatly but only the wise few are noticing: KC (with whom we have 13 games left!)
Me, I'm rooting for the Halos. Despite the Sock Puppet and the Twins Vanquishment, I love Mike Sciosca and Vlad (my son's backup choice in HR Derby) and think they're the best AL club. You?
Finally, closed-circuit to Britt: sorry I let you down. Ridiculously lame three-coat paint job of my sons room and sudden out-of-town Wolves assignment. (Mark Madsen has an iPhone! If you hate the thing, you must see the world's most satisfying iPhone video - http://www.willitblend.com/)
If the Twins, as they've been saying, really intend to try to bring Hunter back at his market value (something that is somewhere between very unlikely and preposterous), then why not trade him now and just re-sign him in the offseason?
A mercy killing. That's what you'd call tonight's third straight one-run loss to the Tigers. A defeat that definitely made foolish the notion that this squad should sacrifice its precious young pitchers and spend its dear lucre to lock up vets at or past their peak. The Twins will not catch both of their AL Central tormentors. Most people can call the Tigers, who with Bonderman/Verlander/Roger have arguably the best top three among major league starting rotations, *and,* statistically at least, the most potent offense in baseball. I personally still like the Indians, but the point is that, at least in 2007, it isn't the Twins year. Time to retool.
You've got to give Jim Souhan credit. His column for tomorrow's Strib (http://www.startribune.com/souhan/story/1313645.htmlotations) goes down fighting for Torii Hunter, making the most intelligent arguments of an ultimately asinine position--that the Twins should keep Hunter--possible. Souhan even says that losing Hunter will make resigning Santana cost more. Maybe so, but by those lights, signing Hunter makes Santana's continued service beyond his current contract all the more unattainable.
Tomorrow's papers will be full of doom of gloom. But let's look at the bright side. By stomping on any realistic chance of pulling a 2006 and besting their division foes in late summer and early fall, the Twins have enabled the ever-sage Terry Ryan and his crew to begin planning, in mid-to-late July, for 2008. When you have a crackerjack scouting system and some desireable, expiring parts, this is a silver lining. Let us now prepare for the the 2008, and 2009 and 2010, pennant races. And let's watch the Garzas and the Bonsers and the Sloweys and hopefully a stray minor league bat or two in action, and think that dreaming of the future isn't nearly as much of a foolish pipe dream as it has been for Twins fans in the past.
This team is on the verge of something very good. Be patient and support the building process.
What is Brauer thinking? Trading for Tommy Herr? That's just plain crazy!
If Liriano had been healthy this year, AND we possessed one more big-time hitter, this would be a team with a good chance at going deep into the postseason- on the bats of Castillo, Mauer, Hunter, Morneau, Cuddyer and the arms of Santana, Liriano, Guerrier, Neshek and Nathan.
We're so close to being a legit contender that it hurts- there is more raw talent on this squad than any in Gardenhire's tenure. But Liriano ISN'T playing, and we DON'T have that additional bat. It does feel like we're several significant steps away from anything...
And, by the way, if we're going to trade Santana, Nathan, Hunter and Castillo, let's get something for D Reyes. And let's PLEASE make every attempt to trade Santana and the other All-Stars to the NL, NOT the friggin' Yankees.