On the flight back to Cleveland after his 48-point, double-overtime performance in Game Five of the Eastern Conference Finals, LeBron James was so literally drained of energy that he required intravenous fluids. Well, somebody better have that drip bag ready two or three times minimum for the NBA Finals that kick off Thursday night in San Antonio. Because the Spurs will make LeBron work for everything he gets....but will also force the King James to be the one who beats them on offense.
Against Phoenix, Gregg Popovich and his crew decided to guard the three-point shooters even if it meant the Suns had room to operate off the dribble after they spread the floor. Against Utah, Pops and company seemed to allow Mehmet Okur (and, initially, Deron Williams) plenty of open looks out at the three-point line while robbing the Jazz of easy shots in the paint. Both turned out to be the right decision. How will they play the Cavs? The decision could be significant, because this series, folks, could be much more competitive than the San Antonio blowout most people expect.
I say this as someone who has been blown away by how well the Spurs have performed in the first three rounds. Duncan's decision-making has generally been spot-on; Ginobili has re-resurrected the notion that he elevates his game in crucial crunchtime moments more dramatically than anyone in the league; and Parker has improved his defense and curbed his mental lapses to the point where, like Duncan, he's never played better than in the past 6 weeks. San Antonio won eight more games than Cleveland while playing in a far tougher conference, and then steamrolled through a vastly more daunting gauntlet of opponents to reach these finals. In fact, a decent argument could be made that any of the Spurs' last three playoff foes would be favored over Cleveland.
But for a number of reasons the Cavs are a dangerous, dangerous team right now. First of all, their coach and their perimeter defense are both ridiculously underrated. Even with the NBA's most galvanizing superstar (as of Game Five, it is no longer Kobe), "winning ugly" has generally been Cleveland's m.o. They throw a starting lineup out of the floor that features a wiry guard tandem of 6-5 Larry Hughes and 6-7 Sasha Pavolvice, with 6-8 LeBron the swingman. Rarely have all three perimeter defenders on a team been simultaneously so long and tall, so sinewy, and so quick. It is hard for opponents to set up because they have precious little space in their comfort zone, precious little peripheral vision, and dramatically reduced passing angles. Against the Cavs, Washington shot 41.3% from the field; New Jersey was 42.8% and Detroit was 41.9%. Individually, Vince Carter was 35%, Jason Kidd 42%, Rip Hamilton 43% and Chauncey Billups 42%. One of the great matchups of this series is how effectively Cleveland can enforce its defensive will on Parker and Ginobili, two of the absolute masters at creating points when starting from the perimeter in the half-court offense.
This is Mike Brown's doing. The Cavs' coach is a Popovich disciple, and it is worth remembering that Pops, too, was grossly underrated despite surprising success early in his coaching tenure. Coaching defense is about making it an unrelenting priority, and Brown is demonstrating that kind of contagious commitment--if he's not in the class of a Popovich or a Larry Brown yet, the arc of his brief career shows he's on track for it. The Spurs have played some mighty fine ballclubs in the postseason thus far, but they haven't encountered a team that can disrupt an offense at the point of attack like Cleveland can. This is the most underrated aspect of Lebron's game, by the way. Not only is he faithful to Brown's rigorous defensive schemes and rotations, but he is so strong and inexorable that he literally wears people out. Tayshaun Prince missed 50 of the 66 shots he attempted in the Eastern finals because he was gassed from guarding LeBron, and then had to get past LeBron (and Hughes and Pavlovic) to get his shot off. As the series wore on and Prince wore out, the Cavs frequently sloughed off him to concentrate on Hamilton and Billups and he still couldn't convert (think of how many open looks Prince got compared to Rip and Billups). Now Bruce Bowen isn't as vital to the Spurs offense as Prince was to the Pistons, but he was able to slide in the dagger of some crunchtime baselines treys in two or three of the wins over Utah. He won't have the legs left to make those shots against the Cavs.
But the question remains: Do the Spurs gang up on LeBron or seal off his options and let him go for his? I say the latter. After the Cavs had beaten the Pistons, the increasingly enlightening Steve Kerr noted that LeBron is exactly the kind of guy that Bowen has trouble containing--large and powerful. Like Raja Bell, Bowen has a bully mentality, one that wants to intimidate. That's out of the question against LeBron, who is strong enough to make Bowen feel puny, and quick enough to make Bowen feel old. If Bowen tries to impede LeBron's pivot, and get up under him like he does to so many opposing point guards, LeBron will have a field day blowing past him *and* drawing the foul. Plus, if LeBron blows past Bowen, who rotates over to defend the paint, putting himself at risk of fouling? Yup, Tim Duncan. And if Duncan is forced into early foul trouble, everything changes for San Antonio. Remember, the only game Utah won was when Duncan was saddled with early whistles. That and TD's suspect free throw shooting comprise the Spurs' very short list of glaring vulnerabilities.
It is Popovich's job to keep his polestar on the court without having the rest of his team get posterized by LeBron's penetration. I think the way he handles it is to make LeBron beat San Antonio with his jumper. Have Bowen play off him enough to scurry into position to draw the charge. Robert Horry is extremely adept at this, and it wouldn't surprise me to see Horry on LeBron some, despite the obvious difference is quickness. Bottom line, if LeBron is making his treys and midrange jumpers, this could be a whale of a series.
Popovich has other options, of course. He could throw multiple traps and double-teams at LeBron, and he may even start off that way, checking to see how much of a flash in the pan Daniel Gibson turns out to be. I think that's playing with fire. And gasoline. If Cleveland as a team has absolutely nothing to lose--and they don't, a prime reason why they are dangerous--Gibson is the guy playing with the lottery money he just inherited from an unknown uncle: The guy could go 0-30 in this round and still get free beers in any Cleveland tavern 30 years from now. Has there been a player in the past 20 NBA Finals more justified in feeling he is blessed by fate and destined to be the hero than Daniel Gibson? Has there been a player whose body language better suggests that he absolutely the right person to assume this role? Forget about his perfect 5-5 FG from beyond the arc in Game Six for a moment; Gibson got to the free throw line 33 times in 94 minutes during the last three Cavs' wins over Detroit, and he made 30 of them. If I'm Popovich, one of my first orders of business is to make Gibson feel vinceable again, as soon as possible, even if it means throwing one less body at LeBron. Meanwhile, at the other end, Parker has to burn Gibson at every opportunity, forcing Brown to yank him.
Flip Saunders will tell you that when it comes to defending LeBron, you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. Saunders got ripped for letting James waltz around for 48 in Game Five. So in Game Six he throws the kitchen sink at King James and LeBron simply dishes off to Gibson, who nails treys with an unfettered rhythm like he gets in after-practice drills when the assistant coaches are feeding him a diet of dishes. Pops is a better defensive coach than Flip and, not coincidentally, has better defenders at his disposal. Another option is to put Duncan on Z Ilgauskas and let Oberto and Elson semi-guard Drew Gooden while rotating over on LeBron. In any case, to snuff out Cleveland's designs on an upset, Pops needs to keep Duncan out of foul trouble and prevent Gibson from continuing to think he's following God's will. I think that means playing off LeBron, giving him the midrange and positioning for the charge when LeBron penetrates. That a recipe that will fatten LeBron's scoring average and have him reaching for the IV after the games.
So, despite all this, why is San Antonio still more likely to be the ones holding hardware over their heads in a week or so? Because the soft underbelly of the Cavs is their interior defense and the Spurs has the savvy to recognize it and the talent to exploit it. If the likes of Mikki Moore and Chris Webber can give Z and Gooden and Varajao fits, imagine how Duncan and Oberto can carve them up. Duncan will be black and blue before this is finished, and as always, how the refs call the game will be enormously important, especially on LeBron's penetration (block or charge?) and the response to Duncan's low post choreography (hack or no call?). I was shocked at how slowly Ilgauskas reacted in the low block versus Detroit, and if it continues, Cleveland is going to have to double down with Pavlovic and James, freeing up the perimeter for Ginobili, Parker and the three-point shooters.
Who is the more reliable scorer, Duncan or LeBron? If the comparison is Duncan from 4 feet versus LeBron from 15 feet, and Duncan isn't clanking from the line, then TD is more reliable and the Cavs are toast. But if the Cavs can figure out a way to defend Duncan without compromising that airtight perimeter D, then the Cavs have some hope. And if LeBron forces Pops to think he's damned every which way--Duncan in foul trouble or Gibson going off or LeBron getting 40--then the Cavs can spring a major upset. I'll repeat what I've said about the past two Spurs opponents: If everything breaks right on their A game, this will be a long, contentious, thrilling series that could go either way. More likely, the Spurs will make Cleveland play their A-minus game, and San Antonio wins it in five, or, more likely, six.


The Cavs remind me of Garnett in his prime pulling together patchwork teams and always making the right plays. Do you remember why year after year they searched for 3 point shooters? It was because nobody was making the open looks from Garnett.
However, LeBron is 22, and the Cavs have 8 years to avoid hosing everything up. (and 15 years to endure LeBron to a big market rumors).
BTW JAMES TO HOUSTON!!!!!!!! hooray!
I'm with Britt. If you are a true basketball fan, you've got to watch the Finals. If you love basketball, you are watching the finals.
For Andy, who enjoys gardening and sitting on his porch, I recommend getting a DVR. I have DVR'ed every game, and watched every play of the series in probably a little over 3 1/2 hours.
Those who are disinterested, are you telling me it's not a joy to watch Parker breakdown a defense? Bowen suffocate arguable the best player in the game? Duncan cemented himself as the best power forward and one of the greatest champions of our era? What's not to love about Ginobli doing it all? I personally love watching the Spurs, whether it's a close game or they are dominating.
Game 3 was a fun game to watch. If you missed it, you probably don't know just how great Lebron is. You would have had to watch him battle double, triple and quadruple teams, continually make the correct plays, only to watch his teammates continually let him down. Yet his team still almost won the game. It was a testament to his greatness. I was on the edge of my seat.
I don't know, Britt. I suppose I wouldn't complain if the Wolves were still playing, but isn't part of the problem that the NBA season is just too damn long. I kind of run out of momentum after the final four and a long season (especially, with the Wolves). The championship series could be a sweep and still the NBA season won't conclude until June 15. I know, it has always been this way (too long) and I didn't always complain. But the older I get, the more I would rather be out in the garden, fishing with my son, enjoying a long bikeride or sitting on the porch drinking a cold can of Surleys. Most outdoor activities go well with the radio tuned to a Twins game, but the NBA requires actively watching it. I just can't find the motivation this year. I am not ridiculing anyone who does watch it, because I used to be and still can be a fanatic for NBA B-ball. But, somehow, the NBA seems to be more about hanging out indoors when it is still too cold to venture outside.
Anyway, I look forward to the Twins Threads, and I still look to your playoff analysis as one thing I just cannot miss for keeping abreast with the going ons of the NBA playoffs, and I am looking already looking forward to the summer winding down, fall approaching and and wondering what kind of Wolves roster I will be following next year for a long season before apathy sets in once again.
Pretty sure he's not the only one watching the Finals. I've watched at least one playoff game damn near every single night they were on TV this postseason. Loser? Perhaps, but I enjoy the game of basketball so I watch. This postseason hasn't been near as exciting as last year, but oh well... I can't help that either.
I look forward to your post Finals recap Britt, that should be a good read.
I gotta throw this out there for you all one last time (I promise Britt!) Being that the NBA season is almost over and Britt will be mostly focused on the Twins soon, anyone that is a fan of the Wolves and NBA could come join us on our TWolvesblog Forums (www.TWolvesblog.com/forum) where we have daily forum discussion on a wide variety of topics (mostly the Wolves and NBA in general) however, we also have forums for football, other sports, and Off-Topic. It is a great place with like minds to discuss the Wolves regarding a huge variety of topics, such as: offseason moves, the draft, game threads, different players, etc. All are welcome.
C'mon Britt,
I am not trying to belittle anyone who's watching the Finals. It's not how I choose to spend my evenings, and judging from the TV ratings, a lot of hoops fans agree.
But, don't take my comments the wrong way.I enjoy reading anything about pro hoops. And I respect anyone who is watching these finals for their dedication to the game.
As far as engaging in fruitless speculation about Wolves roster moves....guilty as charged, and proud of it.
What can I say, I am a Wolves die hard!
Hey Patrick--
The Cavs have a better chance of taking four straight from the Spurs than the Wolves have of winning the NBA championship in 07-08, so belittling those who watch the Finals while obsessing on trades that have a one percent chance of happening isn't exactly a way to recruit folks like me to your priorities.
As someone with a bias toward actually watching people play the game rather than indulging in fruitless speculation, I'll grant you that the Spurs will win this series, and will make my next post about why they have dominated the Cavs. Feel free not to read it, although you may enjoy me copping to the various ways I was wrong about this being a potentially competitive series.
I understand that most of the commenters on this site are Wolves-centric, and I certainly don't want to discourage anyone from posting intelligent hoops commentary on whatever topic they desire. But I don't understand how your hoops knowledge increases by ignoring any round of the crucible of the playoffs, where you learn more about the character of a player and the cohesion of a team than in the previous five months of the regular season. Which is all to say that I am with you, Midlife, and to those who don't watch "because I already know who is going to win," you are missing the forest for the trees.
Once the playoffs are over, subsequent posts will be about the Twins, and, yes, about what the Wolves need and how they might be able to get it. And on those topics, I look forward to what Patrick and the plethora of other bright guys with good ideas are thinking.
Midlife,
You are definitely the only one watching the Finals. Let's be real, the Cavs never had a chance to win more than a single game. Now that doesn't even seem possible.
I still prefer the option of getting Pryz and dumping contracts vs. Aldridge. Why? 1)dumping the contracts is a BIG benefit
2) Aldridge is not a center, and would receive less minutes playing behind KG 3) Portland wants to keep Aldridge and is actively shopping Randolph.
I am starting to think that keeping Ricky Davis until mid-season is likely. What team is going to sign up for an entire season of RD? His expiring contract is going to become more valuable as the season progresses, and somebody somewhere is going to demand a trade or want to dump contracts as their playoff hopes dim.
We should be able to get a pretty decent player for him, if we can be patient.
Hopefully Mike James for Mohammed or Juwan Howard is still on the table. Both of those guys would help. If we can pull off a Portland deal, getting a big for Mike James should become priority number 1.
Britt's analysis of the Cavs chances depended on great perimeter defense and they haven't had that without Larry Hughes. Even as the Cavs got into a truly ugly basketball game (which is their style), who would you favor in that spot? Perhaps the team with more than one option? Unless the Spurs go with Sunday's 4th quarter strategy of leaving Gibson open, we'll be thinking only of the draft come Friday (although from the looks of the posts, I might be the only one watching the games).
So to honor the draft/trade posts: if we can get Aldridge for Conley (and we don't need to dump the bad contract if we can), does that mean we could get a point guard for Davis?
Patrick,
I would do that trade you proposed to Portland in a heartbeat. Clears some deadwood and gives us a servicable big and a more than servicable true PG. That would do wonders to start turning this joke of roster around.
Someone email McHale, cuz god knows he's never on the phones.
Portland would almost surely bite on that deal...maybe too hard. It would be nice to get one more player out of them (am I just getting greedy?!). How about Travis Outlaw for Mad Dog? He seems expendable, and underused. Still young, and CHEAP.
So...#7 (Conley), Huddy, Mad Dog
for Pryz, Outlaw, and Rodriguez or Jack
Damn, I think that is very doable. Portland is giving up almost nothing they want. Getting Conley. And taking on one bad contract.
Wolves are clearing up future cap space in exchange for young guys playing for contracts and a serviceable center.
I didn't even know that Mike Conley senior was the former olympic triple jumper. I remember him.
Anyway, according to Truehoops at ESPN (mentioned previously by Britt) Mike Conley Sr is the agent for his son and Greg Oden. Annnnndddddd, he is working with Bill Duffy.
I think we might be able to work out a deal with Portland with Bill Duffy working the McHale corner.
Snyder...you're a genius. Why haven't I seen that Portland trade?!!
It would really suck to trade a #7 for Pryz, but if we could dump Huddy on them as well? And pick up Jack or Rodriguez as filler? That is starting to look intriguing.
Great idea.
I'm looking at this finals as a real sample as to how functional a top point guard can be.
Don't get me wrong, Duncan is a great, great player, maybe even the best PF ever even if I despise him (the late game offensive rebound and score where he was yelling for a foul when he was quite plainly untouched). However, San Anton wouldn't put on this show if they lacked parker. I can't think of a time that he's been denied the lane over these two games. If that's the kind of upside we're looking at, I would be thrilled with Conley.
Even if the wolves still miss the playoffs, I just want to see a better brand of basketball.
I'd hardly say the NBA combine should be the sole way to judge talent, but I did find it instructive in that it offered some answers to questions about Noah's athleticism and strength compared to the other big men that are available. Personally, I think the Wolves would have a better chance at teaching Noah how to shoot than teaching Brandan Wright how to care, since that's the knock on him.
I have mixed feelings about Conley. On one hand, he's probably a better pure PG prospect than anyone the Wolves have now. On another hand, he's probably a few years away from becoming a top NBA-level PG because of his poor shooting and without assurances that the Wolves could unload one or more of their other guards for a respectable big man, it just distorts the roster even further.
I've read that Portland is trying to figure out some way to get Conley and pair him alongside Oden. If so, I wonder if it would be worth trying to take advantage of that should Conley fall to #7? Would Portland give up Aldridge to get Conley since they would still have Randolph and Pryz? Or perhaps would they trade Pryz and take a bad contract off our hands to get Conley? Could they be convinced to give up a future 1st round pick to take some of the sting off the picks still owed to the Clippers and Celtics?
Please please please please please please please draft Brewer. That's all I've got to say. He will be an All-Star.
If you guys want to watch videos of these guys, here are two links with footage for almost all the projected first round picks:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/prospects
http://www.nba.com/features/draft2007_consensus.html
Speaking of THud...I saw a sign for his upcoming album "Undrafted" on a lightpost downtown this morning.
I think you should actually have to play in games to use the bball references. NBA should sue Huddy for masquerading as a baller. Worst part is Huddy's rapping is worse than his defense.
Oh well, it keeps him busy.
If we are to believe the draft sites, it sounds like ATL is not taking Conley at #3. I think we've got to pick him up if Horford is gone (almost inveitable) at #7.
He appears to have the poise and athleticism to be a top 5 PG. I know he's young, and won't help as much immediately. But, he's the best talent available.
Speaking of THud...I saw a sign for his upcoming album "Undrafted" on a lightpost downtown this morning.
I think you should actually have to play in games to use the bball references. NBA should sue Huddy for masquerading as a baller. Worst part is Huddy's rapping is worse than his defense.
Oh well, it keeps him busy.
If we are to believe the draft sites, it sounds like ATL is not taking Conley at #3. I think we've got to pick him up if Horford is gone (almost inveitable) at #7.
He appears to have the poise and athleticism to be a top 5 PG. I know he's young, and won't help as much immediately. But, he's the best talent available.
I think Brewer would be a good fit if we can trade Ricky Davis for a big guy. If the Wolves were creative they might consider orchestrating a trade down and grabbing Acie Law while sending Davis and McCants/ Foye (either one) for some help on the rebounding and inside shot-blocking.
It is just one scenario, and perhaps a Law and Foye Guard combination will be only an average NBA combo, but it is worth a shot if we can get a good guard coach and sign or trade for a veteran like Fisher to mentor both of them.
I would also consider taking Conley, if he is available, and making a similar trade with Davis and McCants/Foye. BUt, we need some more shooters since Conley has some work before he is an outside threat. I don't think Conley is ready to help a team next year.
If Noah is the best player available I would take him. I like his athletecism and I think he is a very smart player. Someone has got to work on his shooting form. He has a few bad habits in his stroke that would be nice if he worked through them over time. I think he could be the inside presence on the low block next to KG that we need, but I hope Wittman would be comfortable with going with a frontline of KG, Noah and Smith with Foye and McCants in the backcourt. A trade with Davis should strive to get another shooter/defender with a strong work ethic or a veteran point guard to back up Foye and groom him. Perhaps packaging Hassell or Jaric with Davis to get the player or combination of players we need.
20-25 minutes a night for Blount to draw out opposing centers and free up space for KG and Smith to score inside would be a nice role for him. No more however and as soon as he starts being abused inside, bring back Noah.
As far as Noah disappeearing in the championship game, money, I would view this as a positive since Florida won. Noah is not about Noah, but about what he can do to help his team win. That is what the Wolves need more than anything, not another scorer or stat stuffer to replace the loser mentalities of players like Davis.
by the way... if anyone wants a good laugh, check out T-Hud's myspace site. It's definitely worth a few minutes of your time. The videos and the "About T-Hud" area are particularly amusing:
"Sh-sh-sh-shut 'em down!"
http://profile.myspace.com/thudthatnuttyboy
Snyder,
If those players you listed are who we have to chose from, I would take Green...although I would not be upset with Noah.
I'm nervous about taking Noah. He does seem to work hard and have good character, but if I remember correctly, he disappeared in the Championship game. Plus, I'd get tired of seeing his Dad on camera all the time. It seems to me that hustle and hard work can only get you so far without exceptional talent (see Madsen). I might even prefer Al Thornton or Jeff Green to Noah. In any case, I think it's safe to cast aside the idea of how our pick will fit in with KG. He's gone after this year if we don't trade him before then.
It's likely that Oden, Durant, Horford, B Wright, Conley Jr and Brewer will all be taken by the time we pick. If any of those guys are still there, I think we should grab them. After that, I say we take a risk with Yi. If nothing else, at least the increase in revenue from jersey sales would help the frachise (and we'd have a perennial All-Star until the NBA changes the process).
No offense Snyder, but I hate the NBA combine (though I would love it if Brandon Wright dropped to us). Apparently, if we go by the bench press, we should worry about taking durant in the first half of the second round. I wonder how many times Garnett could have benched 185 when he started out with his starvation arms.
I will agree that Noah is a freakish athlete. If he was a good chunk heavier, he would remind me of Ben Wallace. As it is, he is a great defender shot blocking rebounding PF... but it seems we have one of those. Maybe if either him or garnett could put on 40 pounds, we could have a pivot man.
If I were choosing between Brewer and Noah, then no question, I'd take Brewer. But despite what ESPN says, I really don't expect Brewer to be available at the #7 spot.
I'm expecting the Wolves to be choosing between Noah, Hawes or one of the SFs like Julian Wright, Thornton or Green. If that's the case, I'd go with Noah.
The Wolves do not need another scoring option. They need a big who's going to play defense and relegate Mark Blount to the backup role he deserves.
By the way, folks who think Noah is not an athlete should go check out Chad Ford's blog on the draft combine results. He had 12 reps with the 185 lb bench press and showed a 37.5 vertical jump, which was way better than Brandan Wright did.
Can we get some gossip going on the Wolves again? Any trades in the works? Any chance we'll get to see the playoffs here again next year?
The Spurs-Cavs series should be interesting. If SA dominates, it will still be interesting seeing a well-oiled championship machine. If the Cavs can make it a six game series all the better and if they win, well that would be one hell of an upset.
Andy B: My biggest fear is that the Wolves draft Spencer Hawes. I'm basing my fears solely on the fact that he is white, not a good rebounder in college, and not incredibly athletic. Granted, perhaps Hawes is better than my biases give him credit , but he still scares me. He has big-stiff written all over him.
Supposedly Hawes has upside on the offensive end of the floor with his great post moves. Well, who is going to get him the ball in the post and how is he going to stay there when he's a skinny little wimp? Also, who will he guard? Oden will demolish him and nearly everyone else except for Joel Pryzbilla is too quick for him.
Noah appears to have limited offensive upside. But he rebounded and blocked shots wel in college and is super athletic. The only althletic, 7 foot- rebounder and shot blocker the wolves have ever had is KG. Noah is no KG, but he can contribute right away on the boards with his quickness and leaping ability. Who cares about his offense. The wolves have no one who rebounds the ball inside and gets putbacks except for 6 foot 7 inch Craig Smith. Mad dog can't do it, blount is too far away. I hope we get Noah. We really need some tall people.
Mike Brown lead his team to the Finals, that's a commendable achievement. The Cavs defense is way underated and excellent, much credit should be given to Brown for their play at the defensive end. However, before we annoint Brown as an underrated coach, watch the Cavs offense. Simmons has been ripping Brown all playoffs without giving him the credit he deserves for Cleveland's defensive intensity, however his critism of the Cavs offense is on point. The "give the ball to LeBron and have him chuck a 22 footer play" was brilliant in game 5, but the offense as a whole lacks creativity. Why don't they run more plays for LeBron in the post? The guy is 6'9". Why don't they run more plays with LeBron coming off screens as a decoy to get some big fellas layups? The Cavs offense is hard to watch, and most of it has to do with their sets, I blame that on Mike Brown.
This Cavs team is bad. I remember watching a TNT Thursday game in which they were dismantled by the Suns. I mean absolutely torn apart, piece by piece. The team is poorly put together. Why sign Big Z when the league is going smaller and you have the best fast break finisher in n the league? How do you not get Boozer to SIGN the contract he agreed upon? Isn't that you main job if you're a GM. Think of how much better this team would be with Boozer instead of Gooden. I've just been disapointed in the playoffs so far and my feeling is games 1, and 2 will be close with the Spurs pulling out both games. I then expect the Spurs to blow out the Cavs in game three, then win game 4 for the sweep.
What bothers me is that many teams in the league are playing great team basketball that's fun to watch, but somehow we managed to get LeBron into the Finals to watch him go one on five, and shoot 40 free throws a la Dwayne Wade last year. I'm sick of the league searching for the next Jordan when the Showtime Lakers were always more fun to watch. If Dallas (last year) or Phoenix (this year) would have one the title I feel like the entire league would move in the direction away from the isolation game toward motion offense, but the slug it out style seems to always work better in the playoffs so it looks like it will be here to stay.
One Wolves related note. The thing that bothers me most about Dwayne Casey's coaching tenure is his stray from the focus at the defensive end. Foye, Ricky (if he got his head out of his ass), Hassell, KG, and Eddie (RIP) could have been a top notch defensive unit. Instead we had to suffer through Mike James meadering around screens and Mark Blount guarding the rim as though he could catch cancer from it. A committment to defense is the easiest way to be a good team in the NBA, and we went away from that committment before the season even started. I give props to the Cavs for because team defense is what got them to the Finals.
One final question, would you trade the supporting cast of the Wolves for the supporting cast of the Cavs? I would prefer the Wolves roster minus KG over the Cavs roster minus LeBron. Seriously. What's that say about Kevin and LeBron?
I suspect Reusse might be exaggerating just a little, but if it means the Wolves end up with Noah instead of Spencer Hawes, I'm all for that.
Noah is not athletic enough to make a significant impact in the NBA- a poor man's Joe Smith. I am thinking Corey Brewer will be the best player available.
Despite the excellent writing and coverage by Britt, I still can't get myself to watch any NBA playoff Basketball this year. I blame it on Ricky Davis.
I'm still holding out some hope on this draft restoring some respectability to the Wolves and especially KG. This mornings Stribe, Ruesse makes a case for Noah. Mostly arguing that Noah's ability on the defensive end (Wittman says he can guard all five positions point to center in the NBA -I'd like to see it, but I gotta see it first) and his presence as a teammate who works hard are two things the Wolves desparately need.
I guess it makes me like the idea of picking Noah a little more.
We'll see how smart I am in a week or so.
By the way, in defense of ESPN, I wandered over to Henry Abbott's TrueHoop blog (a site I don't frequent nearly enough), and he has an analysis that was up more than 24 hours before mine in which he reviewed play-by-play tapes of the two Spurs-Cavs games this season, and makes the same point about the potential for LeBron getting Duncan in foul trouble. By the gist of the post he also thinks people may be underestimating the Cavs.
So, while I do appreciate the flattery, let's remember there are a lot of smart people out there, including many of you readers. As I've said many times, the quality of your comments is what really makes this fun, so fire away with your best shot(s)on what you think of things. I'm out of town on another assignment and might not be able to post them as rapid-fire as is usual, but I promise I'll throw up anything that ventures your analysis on all things basketball. Posts simply kissing my tush will be doinked.
Oh, and here's the link to TrueHoop:
http://myespn.go.com/nba/truehoop
Excellent analysis as usual, Britt. The only thing that makes me lean toward the Spurs in five (yes, that's my official prediction) is my sense that the Cavs are just happy to be here. It gives me no pleasure to say it, having been a Cavs supporter since the World B. Free and Miracle of Richfield days, but I get the distinct feeling that winning the Eastern Conference was their "Finals"--and that little extra edge that took them over the top in the Detroit series will be missing.
Obviously I can't prove any of this and it seems sort of trite and ridiculous when compared to your reasoned arguments; but nonetheless that is my position.
I agree - a very through and interesting breakdown. For that reason I doubt ESPN/FoxSports is interested. They seem to like brief, simplistic analysis augmented by a lot of fluff. Would an article that long, for example, been possible without at least one Eva reference?
Seriously, Britt. You make me unashamed to follow professional athletics. In fact, you're probably the only columnist I can say that about. I hope all this flattery doesn't distract from the board too much, but you deserve a wider audience and sports fans deserve intelligent observations and skillful writing.
ESPN should be ringing you anyday now, Britt. If NBA analysts were the Republican presidential hopefuls, you're their Ron Paul, spouting fact after overlooked fact, while the emotional simplfiers hog the spotlight.