With Houston and Utah still to be decided by a 7th game, my predictive powers on first-round series stands at 6-1, with the Golden State upset the lone blemish (and if you read what I wrote, I knew the Warriors would give the Mavs plenty of problems). In the East, I even had the number of games right, except for calling the Bulls in 5 or 6 over the Heat rather than the four game sweep.
But enough smug preening. Today's genius is tomorrow's fool, as I may well be about to demonstrate with the following picks.
Detroit (1) vs. Chicago (5)
Without slighting the epic Suns-Spurs series, this is the second-round matchup that intrigues me the most, in part because my take seems so much at odds with conventional wisdom. Specificially, how are the Bulls not the faster, deeper, and perhaps even more talented team here?
The marquee personal duel is between small forwards Tayshaun Prince and Luol Deng, and without question it's a dandy. Prince ranks with Bruce Bowen and Shane Battier as the best on-ball defenders in the game today, while Deng is quickening into a star right before our eyes over the past year. At the other end, Prince may be the Pistons' second-best offensive option to Chauncey Billups when the game is on the line, but will have difficulty with Deng, who is no slouch on D and is one of the few players with a comparably enormous wingspan.
It's hard to imagine both Prince and Deng not coming up big--there'll be no dominance either way here. By contrast, the most volatile matchup may be at the shooting guard spot, between Rip Hamilton and Ben Gordon. Both are deadly jump-shooters, of course, but until recently you'd have to give Hamilton the decided edge, both because of the four-inch height differential (6-7 to 6-3) and for the fact that Rip has a nonstop motor and Gordon has generally been, shall we say, inconsistent with his effort on the defensive end. Like many of the Bulls, Gordon has stepped up all facets of his game in recent weeks, however, and is shooting with a sublime confidence that will spell danger for Detroit if Hamilton can't dissuade it early. It is vital for Detroit's prospects that Hamilton school Gordon at the other end, drawing fouls on either Gordon or Ben Wallace with his penetration while mixing in those mid-range jumpers Pistons coach Flip Saunders is so adept at choreographing.
Okay, once you get past Prince and Hamilton, where is the Pistons' team speed? Billups is built like a tank and will occasionally be unstoppable when his long-range jumper is flowing, but Kirk Hinrich is a worthy foil, physical enough not to get manhandled the way Billups abuses most opposing points, and a smart, tenacious defender who will frustrate Billups' ball distribution and force him into taking tough shots. At the other end, if Hinrich regains the shooting touch that abandoned him in the Heat series (one of the precious few things that went wrong for Chicago), then the Pistons are in trouble.
Move on to center and power forward. In the pivot, Ben Wallace and Chris Webber are an apples and oranges tandem; I'd call it a big edge for the Bulls. I understand how Webber has florished under Saunders, but unless Hamilton and Prince are gulping rebounds, the Pistons better be shooting lights out, because Webber isn't grabbing many over Big Ben and PJ Brown will box out Rasheed Wallace all day long. I imagine Saunders' plan will be to spot up Webber for midrange jumpers at the elbow and off pick and rolls, while positioning 'Sheed for treys in the corner and outside the key--the Bulls will either have to bring Ben Wallace and PJ out to guard them, play zone, rotate frequently, or concede the open looks. I think Scott Skiles will have Wallace contest Webber because he's quick enough to recover, and wait and see if 'Sheed can hit long-range. If he does, Skiles can go to Nocioni on 'Sheed, provided Nocioni's plantar troubles are manageable.
With a fundamental horse like Brown and a persistent, clandestine-fouling gadfly like Nocioni on him, how long do you think it will be before 'Sheed pops his cork? Throw in having to joust for boards with Big Ben, and 'Sheed ability to play within himself becomes a problematic dilemma for Detroit.
But the biggest reason why I think the Bulls will win this series is their superior depth. Commentators like to talk about Detroit's front-line squadron, but only Antonio McDyess is a quality reserve. Dale Davis is old and slow, a bad matchup versus the Bulls, and Saunders lacks confidence in Nazr Mohammad. It bears noting that aside from McDyess, no bench player got more than 50 minutes in the four games versus Orlando; why would Saunders willingly give his scrubs more burn against the Bulls?
Meanwhile, Chicago has the numbers to run and gun and wear down the older Piston starters. Not only are Deng, Hinrich, Nocioni, Gordon and Ben Wallace all comfortable in an up-and-down game, but bench guys Chris Duhon, Thabo Sefolosha and Tyrus Thomas likewise thrive in uptempo settings. Even at the bottom of the Bulls bench you've got defensive specialist Adrian Griffin with a ton of playoff experience, and serviceable backup center Malik Allen.
Unless Hamilton decisively wins his matchup with Gordon, and/or 'Sheed and Webber are converting bushels of open jumpers, I think the Bulls will steadily put down the throttle and wear the Pistons away. Chicago in 5 or 6.
Cleveland (2) vs. New Jersey (6)
The two first-round series I watched the least were Cleveland-Washington and Toronto-New Jersey, so the take here will be necessarily fuzzy. Nevertheless, this series seems to be a referendum on the intelligence of the Cavs generally and LeBron James in particular. About the only way the Nets win is if they entice the Cavs into a track meet that maximizes the talent of their glorious open court stars Jason Kidd, Vince Carter, and Richard Jefferson. A super athlete like LeBron is going to be sorely tempted to take the bait; ditto Larry Hughes and perhaps even Drew Gooden and, off the bench, Donyell Marshall.
Here's why that's idiotic: Who on the Nets can guard Z Ilgauskas in paint? Who can box out Gooden? Jason Collins, Mikki Moore and Josh Boone is what New Jersey has in response. Z and Gooden both shot 60 percent or better from the field against Washington. Working patiently in half-court sets and getting feeds from LeBron and Hughes in half-court penetration, they should do it again against New Jersey. Meanwhile, Toronto's point guards went crazy on offense against Kidd and company--why shouldn't Hughes be able to do the same? And we haven't even talked about Lebron getting his 35, even just working in the flow of the offense.
The Nets' Jason Kidd averaged a triple-double in the six games against the Raptors, but you can expect both Larry Hughes and Aleksander Pavlovic to deter him more than TJ Ford and Jose Calderon, with Eric Snow needing to provide 10-12 minutes of quality coverage too. How many games New Jersey wins will depend on whether Carter goes crazy for a game or two, whether Cleveland stupidly decides to run with the Nets, and whether Z and Gooden collectively pull one of their occasional no-shows in the low block. Playing smart, the Cavs have the power to put this away in five. I'll fudge it a little and say Cleveland in 5 or 6.
Phoenix (2) vs. San Antonio (3)
This is the heavyweight match, with the winner immediately stamped as the favorite to become the next NBA champion. What was most impressive about Phoenix's 5-game blitz of the Lakers was its defensive prowess, and it's true that in Raja Bell and Shawn Marion, the Suns have a pair of rugged, versatile components to throw at opposing offenses. As the epitome of the new uptempo small-ball style, they not only have the best floor general for it in Steve Nash, but have the most evolved defense when executing a full-bore transition game on offense.
But as Dallas discovered to their chagrin in the first round, even potentially great teams run into clubs who just happen to match up in a manner that exposes their weaknesses, and the Spurs certainly qualify as the Suns' nemesis. For one thing, as they proved against Denver, San Antonio recovers to defend transition better than anyone in the league--not only do they scamper back four or five strong, but they're already communicating how to defend switches and other proactive gambits to disrupt penetration, ball movement and open shots. Most clubs are in scramble mode versus Phoenix's fast break; far more often than any other team, the Spurs are playing chess with it.
Secondly, the Spurs offense is vastly underrated, and reminiscent of those similarly underrated Houston Rockets championship teams of the 90s, the first club to fully utilize the inside-outside aspects of the three-point threat. To really make it go, you need a multi-talented big man capable of an almost automatic basket whenever he's not double-teamed, yet with enough instinct and court vision to dish to cutters and three-point shooters--Houston had Hakeem, the Spurs have Duncan. You also need not just one or even two but a group of players who can nail the trey from various points on the floor. Houston had Cassell and Kenny Smith and Robert Horry, and the Spurs have Michael Finley and Bruce Bowen and Manu Ginobili and Brent Barry and, not incidentally, Robert Horry. For the icing on the cake, San Antonio also has two of the best penetrators in the game in Tony Parker and Ginobili, the perfect combo to draw fouls and otherwise burn opponents who are flying around trying to defend both Duncan down low and all those bombadiers outside: Next thing they know, Parker and Ginobili and blowing past them. Raja Bell will be an enormous boon to preventing some of this, and Leandro Barbosa and Marion are both lightning quick, but it won't be enough to handle Duncan down low and still choke off the outside bombs.
As good as San Antonio is, of course, Phoenix is far from helpless. Nash still can't defend anyone worth a damn (Barbosa needs to play plenty on Parker), but when he's in rhythm, it really is the greatest offensive show in basketball today. Nash is no Nowitzki--when it matters most, he'll be a factor. Barbosa is the fastest player in the NBA. Stoudamire may be the fastest center. Marion is a superb finisher who plays four inches taller than his actual 6-7. Bell abets his shut-down D with a deadly three-point shot. The wild card? Boris Diaw, who has generously yielded much of last year's mojo to Amare in the Suns' grand scheme of things, but who needs to get himself more involved both in doubling Duncan and in burying the midrange jumper with the alacrity he showed in the 2006 playoffs.
If the Suns play their A game, this will be a phenomenal series, as good as last year's Spurs-Mavs classic, that will go 7 games and could swing either way. I think San Antonio will compel Phoenix to play their A- game, with the result being the Spurs in 6.


I didn't see the San Antonio - Phoenix game but Pops made a comment about Phoenix playing some pretty good defense. A 20-pt win against a team you had difficulty with all year is pretty impressive. The balance is so much better for the Suns this year. San Antonio is an excellent team and will bounce back, but I for one I'm hoping Phoenix gets past them. If they do, I don't see any other team stopping them from becoming champs.
Reggie Miller = Worst. Commentator. Ever.
I hope Golden State can pull out the series, but Utah presents pretty tough matchup problems. Definitely a worse situation for GS than playing Houston would have been. Utah will probably pull this out in 6 or 7. I can't see them winning more than 1 game in Oakland.
I don't think GS has lost any confidence either, it's just a bad personnel matchup for them.
Reggie Miller is AWFUL! Not insightful, extremely inarticulate; he even fumbles sports-commentator cliches and over-used idioms and analogies. He's worthless. As are Jon Barry and Bill Walton. Can't David Stern and Ted Turner join forces to clone Doug Collins and Hubie Brown?
Not giddy? fair enough. But Midlife, the Pistons answer for Duncan is Rasheed Wallace, who's probably the best ever at guarding Duncan one-on-one. In fact, Sheed on the block might give Duncan more problems than Duncan gives Sheed. (of course the big question is 'can Flip get Sheed to post up and not stray to the 3point line for a quarter or two').
While Bowen tries to slow down Rip, Billups has the edge on Parker, and San Anton has no true center to handle the glass against Sheed, McDyess, Maxiel, and even Webber taking turns down low. Detroit's well equipped to get that trophy back, especially if it's going thru San Anton instead of Phoenix.
Golden State continues to impress and entertain at the same time. Game 1 of this series was extremely fun to watch. The Warriors should be hanging their head high in that they almost stole home court in a close loss. Davis appears to have recovered from his hamstring injury and even if he wasn't 100% (a lot of his shots clanged off the front rim) he was the floor general Golden State needs him to be. The synergy between Richardson, Jackson, and Davis is scintillating to watch. Utah's Deron William's and Carlos Boozer also continue to impress for how well they play the game all around. Despite San Antonio-Phoenix being the marquee matchup in the West, I think this is going to be as good.
Does anybody like TNT's Reggie Miller ? He said that it was better for the Warriors to get blown out than to lose a close game like they did. I couldn't disagree more. It was the Warriors close game against Dallas in Game 5 that gave them the impetus to shock the Mavericks in the series clincher. I don't think Golden State has lost any confidence.
I wouldn't say giddy either...I reserve giddy for the hometown team. But I do really like the Pistons, especially The Butler. He always steps it up this time of year. I actually think the Pistons are better with Webber (vs. Wallace). Every guy in that starting 5 can score no matter who you throw at them. SA-Detroit would (will) be a classic.
Before anyone worries about another snoozefest final, we should remember these aren't Larry Brown's Pistons. The change between Ben and Webber says it all. Although they play hard defense, Flip's team has a scorer at every position. Most likely, both teams will get back on D to limit fast break points, but there is beauty in ball rotation and open jumpers.
As much as I like the Pistons, I don't know how they can handle Duncan down low. But maybe they showed a rope a dope strategy in yesterday's game. They can still win when a team shoots 50 (50!!!) free throws.
I don't know if Giddy is the word to describe my feelings about it. I like both Detroit and SA, but they are not the most dynamic teams in the NBA right now.
If it was Cleveland or Chicago against GS or the Suns, I would be a lot more giddy. These scenarios seem like they would be a lot more fun than SPurs/ Pistons.
That said, I am rooting for Flip.
is anyone else giddy about the inevitable Spurs-Pistons rematch of the '05 Finals? The two most experienced teams, with the most big-game swagger, trying to build their case for team of the decade -- Spurs going for it's 3rd trophy of the 00s, Detroit for it's 2nd. This would be the closest we've ever been to the clashes the Celtics-Lakers gave us in the 80s! (when i was too young to give a damn).
Kidd is tremendous. Pretty much the epitome of "beat you in so many ways". I don't feel the same way about Jefferson and Carter, however, and they are at least as prone to poor shooting nights (as we saw yesterday) as King James. If the Cavs keep the game slow (IF they have the maturity to do that), I think Carter & Jefferson will miss enough of their shots that LeBron & team continue eking out wins.
As an aside, do you remember the talk of Kidd going to San Antonio? How good would that have been?
People should be picking the Jazz, they won the division and GS was an eight seed. But I think GS is turning into the trendy pick to get to the WC Finals. Hot or not, they are still the Warriors.
Defending my NJ pick. Yeah, I remember that LeBron guy. And I know that he can take over games, but at this point in his career, that is really all he can do. JKidd, on the other hand, makes his teammates better every night.With him on the floor, you know NJ will be in a position to compete in every game. A poor shooting night from King James, and the Cavs are toast.
Patrick,
I think I could just as easily say Golden State gets no respect. They just blew out a 67-win team in an elimination game, have a dynamic point guard who just played one of the best series in recent memory, and they're red hot and full of confidence. Still, almost everyone seems to be picking the Jazz. You're right about Sloan being a great coach, but so is Nelson. Why assume Golden State is suddenly going to go cold just because they're coming off a great stretch? I say the keep the momentum another round. But yeah, we'll see. Too bad all the games start so late!
Golden State in 6? Really Mike?
Who's going to guard Boozer? AK's coming on (so much for the Wolves picking him up) and Deron William vs Baron is close to a push. Utah is nothing if not disciplined. Sloan will have those guys grinding it out and pounding GS down low.
I guess we'll see. Utah just gets no respect.
Well, I guess I found out why everybody likes the Pistons. Cancel at least the front end of that "Chicago in 5 or 6" Izi; I think Midlife might have a better handle on his favorite playoff squad than I do.
The jittery Bulls stunk out loud, and I can accept that. Gordon got in early foul trouble and then had no rhythm--as feared, Hamilton did dominate him--and Tyrus Thomas was just horrible. But what puts my prediction in jeopardy is Detroit's bench. If Jason Maxiell even comes close to the numbers he put up in Game One again in this series, it is an enormous boost for Detroit. And when both he and McDyess are nailing midrange jumpers, Flip doesn't have to ride Webber's passing and suffer his lack of defense and mobility.
I'm not ready to bail on the Bulls just yet. But when Denver beat San Antonio in Game One of the first round, I knew the Spurs well enough to know Magic Johnson was wrong (as usual) in his belief that the Nugs would prevail. This Bulls squad doesn't have the same pedigree. Will they respond? Hope so, if for no other reason than it will enliven the competitiveness of a series versus an obviously primed Pistons team.
The Spurs and Suns didn't disappoint, eh? Tell me Steve Nash doesn't garner huge macho props and add to his growing legend for not even flinching after *the bridge of his nose* hit Tony Parker so hard that Parker went down in a heap and had a large welt on his forehead. Nash was busy seeing if Parker was okay.
Meanwhile, that's the best I've seen Tim Duncan play in at least three years, coming on the heels of his masterful Denver series. One subplot that bears watching is how badly the Spurs are exposed when Jacque Vaughn subs in for Parker and has to guard either Nash or Barbosa, or sink a wide open jumper. Pops may want to think about Benno Udrich--it can't be any worse than what Vaughn provided.
Yeah, Parker sold that "shove" from Barbosa on the out of bounds play, but that evened out inept refereeing on two bogus charges--the one on Vaughn when Nash slid under him (that was a superstar vs. sub bias) and the other when Bell was in the circle when Parker was whistled in the throes of crunchtime.
As for the Jazz-Warriors, here's why I think it will be Utah in 6.
No good matchup for Boozer, who was phenomenal against Houston.
Dallas had no one like Kirilenko (not even Josh Howard) to throw at the Warriors.
Golden State was unconscious from the field throughout the first round. Law of averages says that doesn't continue.
Utah is the best rebounding team in the NBA, with the highest differential, and an impressive board triumph over the much taller Rockets.
Golden State thrives on turnovers. Deron Williams doesn't commit that many; Derek Fisher is a former point guard as his backcourt mate; and Okur is a catch-and-shoot guy out on the perimeter.
Jerry Sloan vs Don Nelson in the final 8 of the NBA playoffs: Who do you like?
It seems Patrick may have forgotten what a monster LeBron is. If you're going to mention that NJ has kid, we need to remember that King James is very very good.
As Britt pointed out, if the Cavs avoid running, NJ has nothing to put up a fight. Z can be very difficult to handle when he's not injured. He's just too big for New Jersey's interior D to effect his shot. Gooden should have an unimpeded path to rebounds, and if the first game's rebound totals are any indication (51-37), this series could be surprisingly easy for the Cavs.
Regardless of the outcomes, this is for sure going to be the best round of this year's playoffs. It's farely clear whoever wins the Suns-Spurs and Bulls-Pistons matchups will meet in the finals, where the West's Champion will prove the conference's superiority.
I'm seeing long series here. The Warrior's luck won't run out before they dispatch the Jazz. They've got the firepower and I don't see Utah being disciplined enough to avoid trying to run and gun with Golden State. Chicago will grind out a victory over Detroit, despite being blown out in game one. The Bulls youth and athleticism will be too much, and Flip'a jump shooters will go cold long enough for the Bulls to steal the series.
It's hard to pick against the Spurs because they are such a balanced, experienced team. But I'll take the Suns in this one because they are faster and I just think it's Nash's year. I doubted their style as much as anyone, but with Stoudimire, I see no reason why they can't be a championship team. As D'Antoni says, the team with the best defense is the team who has the most points at the end of the game.
Golden State in 6
Chicago in 7
Phoenix in 7
Cleveland in 6
Round 2 reality check. Time for the small ball proponents to be proven wrong. Chicago beat a Miami team that literally limped into the playoffs. Golden State will never again see a stretch of six games where they shoot that well (or their opponents shoot that poorly), and Phoenix (although a very good team) will be shown by the Spurs that you do need to play defense to win a championship. The Cavs. I am sorry, but they just suck. NJ sucks too, but they have Jason Kidd.
Utah in 6
Detroit in 5
Spurs in 7
NJ in 6.
Great preview, Britt. Interested to know if the Pistons' game 1 blowout changes things a bit -- if it goes 6 or 7, it's hard to count the D out. Also, wondering if you think Golden State can control the tempo against Utah the way they ran Golaith off the court last week.
After watching McGrady's press conference, i think we all sympathize, having seen KG be victim to similar circumstances for so long. So, is there way we can just team up some of these perennial playoff underacheivers? Yao for KG straight up? Misery loves company... and if misery is as versatile as KG and McGrady, that'd be one hell of a tandem.
I still think the Pistons win this one. As years of following the 50 win wolves reminds us, you can win alot of games, even without rebounding, when your big guys shoot the jumper consistently. I also think that Britt's requirement that the Pistons swing men gobble up rebounds is fine, because Prince and Hamilton will. Even if Ben Wallace is a superior rebounder to Webber, it's not like he can sleepwalk his way to rebounds. Webber still picked up 7 rebounds a game in just 30 minutes. Wallace, too, will be dependent on teammates to get rebounds, but his are not as able as Webber's.
The thing is, Ben Wallace is a step slower than he used to be, the pistons bigs will get shots because he needs to stay near the paint. Also, Sheed can abuse PJ Brown. It was only a few years ago that people felt Sheed was a good draft pick before KG. Although he should play more with his back to the basket, there is a huge talent gap at PF that I think Britt may have minimized.
I am worried about the bench, but I'm hoping the Pistons can pretend to be Celtics '88 and have their starters carry them to the finals.