A Small Appreciation of Bracey Wright
First off, thanks to those who gave me feedback on how to handle this disheartening point of the season, when the only intelligent thing for the Wolves to do is lose. Which is a bittersweet bit of good fortune, because about the only thing this squad is capable of doing is losing.
But game analysis is a broken record, especially with the departure of Garnett for the season. There are only so many times I can bash Davis-Blount-James before it feels less like insight and more like a grudge. I've tried to go out of my way to praise this troika when they've done well, but since I think they are all still overvalued in the eye of the casual fan (but probably only the most masochistic of the ones who are my readers), and since I don't want to simply echo conventional wisdom, I still wind up hammering them more than is necessary.
Let's get positive for just a second then, and talk about Bracey Wright. Word is the Wolves drafted Wright largely on the enthusiasm on then-assistant GM Rex Chapman, and I confess to being bewildered at the choice at the time, before remembering Kevin McHale's history of throwaway second-round picks--since remedied by Craig Smith. And, belatedly, Bracey Wright. No one denied the kid could shoot, and certainly not after he finished 4th in scoring in the D-League at better than 21 ppg last year. It's just that he's relatively frail, not very quick, not very athletic, really; an undersized 'tweener guard of the sort who's upside is making close to six figures in a European league.
The sad part of this tale is that I still don't see him being anything more than someone at the end of an NBA bench. But all that said, if you paid attention on his quick cameoes, including last night's loss to the Nuggets in Denver, you can't help but be impressed with Wright's poise. Once he finally joined the Wolves in Minnesota last season, he jacked up jumpers whenever he was open, then endured a brief experiment when the braintrust tried to turn him into a point guard--which could well have been camouflage for tanking.
This season he's played a grand total of 175 minutes and is shooting less than 40% from the field. Even his most impressive stat, a team-best +49 (KG is second at +10 and Rashad McCants' +6 is the only other positive), has been accomplished almost exclusively in garbage time or the substitute-rich middle periods of the game. But what catches your eye is that Wright has been feverishly polishing the important "little" things about the game, like fostering ball movement (a totally lost art on this dysfunctional squad), making sound judgments on defensive rotations, not trying to extend himself beyond his skill set with foolish passes or showboating, and generally displaying a consistent effort with a generous attitude despite the circumstances. Last night he played a season-high 26:29 and canned 13 points (5-11 FG, 1-5 3P, 2-4 FT) with 5 rebounds, 2 assists and a pair of steals versus one turnover. Playing on the floor with the NBA's ultimate jitterbug in AI, with absolutely no interior defense behind him, he once again didn't embarrass himself. Most likely two or three years from now he'll be a vague footnote in our collective memory banks, but last night and during a disastrous three-month stretch where the Wolves have compiled the second-worst record in the entire NBA (only the Milwaukee Bucks, at 11-33, undercut Minnesota's 12-33 mark) Bracey Wright has instead been a minor but not unappreciated grace note. Good for him.
2. The Great Brittons
You know the blog ethos has gone to my head when I start naming award picks after myself (full name: Paul Britton Robson Jr.) in a desperate bid to break the monotony. Anyway, the virtual statuettes go to:
Coach of the Year
1. Jeff Van Gundy
2. Sam Mitchell
3. Jerry Sloan
Van Gundy weathered injuries to Yao and McGrady and has his team primed to be the foe nobody wants to face in the playoffs. Mitchell likewise has contended with injuries, early-season rumors about his own firing, and a slew of rookies, to post more than 45 wins, albeit in an inferior conference. Sloan has mixed and matched his talent with an unconventional front line and produced perhaps his most creative season. Honorable mention to Don Nelson, Flip Saunders, Avery Johnson, and, as Steve Aschburner astutely pointed out on Sunday, Dwane Casey.
6th Man
1. Leandro Barbosa
2. Manu Ginobili
This really is a two-person contest. The Suns' high-powered offense actually kicks up a notch in speed and productivity when Barbosa enters the game. Ginobili is an erstwhile stud-starter who has sacrificed a bit of ego for the good of his team. Former contenders Ben Gordon and Mike Miller are starters this year. Honorable mention, way back, goes to Jerry Stackhouse, Antonio McDyess, and Earl Watson.
Rookie of the Year
1. Brandon Roy
2. Jorge Garbajosa
3. LeMarcus Aldridge
Roy is so far ahead of everyone else here that he should be a unanimous choice. Garbajosa is the already mature foreign export crucial to the Raptors' early rise, who blew out his leg in brutal fashion. Aldridge is going to be really good and make Joel Pryz expendable in the process. For the record, I'd put Randy Foye and Craig Smith 4th and 6th, respectively, surrounding Rudy Gay.
Defensive Player of the Year
1. Shane Battier
2. Tayshaun Prince
3. Bruce Bowen
My rules: Blocks and steals are overrated; rotational help coupled with stolid on-ball defense is paramount, with versatility also important. Battier and Van Gundy is a match made in hell for opposing swing men. Prince helped restore Flip Saunders' defensive reputation by leading the Big Ben-less Pistons to top five finishes in fewest points and lowest FG% by opponents. Bowen needs (or at least gets) six or seven more minutes of rest than the other two, which about the only reason he's third. Honorable mention: Ben Wallace, Marcus Camby, Tim Duncan.
Most Improved
1. Deron Williams
2. Al Jefferson
3. Kevin Martin
Another no-brainer. In Year Two, Williams has become the MVP of a typically tough Sloan-coached team, leap-frogging Chris Paul and stamping himself as most likely successor to Nash as the NBA's premiere point guard. Jefferson's second half has been phenomenal beneath the radar due to the Celts' miserable season--pairing him with Oden or Durant would put them in the second round, minimum, next season. Martin is an overachiever who has probably now reached his ceiling, but you've got to admire the doubled-scoring average, especially on a team with shoot-first cohorts like Bibby and Artest.
MVP
1. Steve Nash
2. Dirk Nowitzki
Another two-person race. For two straight seasons I really grimaced at Nash getting this award, firmly believing it belonged to Shaq and then LeBron, respectively. Now, in what has so clearly been Nash's greatest season, one of the most stunning point guard displays in the history of the NBA, Nash will be denied the award because voters don't regard him as luminous enough to be placed alongside Bird, Wilt, and Bill Russell as three-time winners. And he isn't. But he is the MVP of 2006-07, hands down. Notwitzki would be a mediocre choice even without Nash in the running, but gets extra credit for sublimating his stats for the good of a 60+ win team. Honorable mention to Kobe Bryant, the anti-Nash in that his legend will always be larger than his collection of MVP trophies, LeBron James, who will demonstrate why this award is best voted on after the playoffs, and Tim Duncan, the ultimate glue guy.
3. Rockets-Jazz Playoff Preview
This is the playoff series I am most looking forward to watching. Here are a few reasons why.
* Sloan vs. Van Gundy
Two of the league's best coaches. With his multiple screens, weakside cuts and various picks and rolls, Sloan puts meat-and-potatoes offense on the court as well as anyone in the game. The Jazz ranked second only to Phoenix in team FG% this season, despite finishing next-to-last from beyond the arc. What that means is a bevy of high percentage shots developed through physicality, guile, and unselfish ball movement, all hallmarks of Sloan teams. And this outfit is his most talented since the days of Stockton and Malone. Meanwhile, Van Gundy is one of the NBA's better defensive tacticians, always landing his teams among the top handful is lowest opponent FG% and leading the league this year with a .429 mark. JVG, too, has his most talented team since he took the Knicks to the NBA finals.
* Aces in the hole
The Jazz don't really have an answer for Yao Ming. Their starting center, Mehmet Okur, is an outside shooter--the team's only real three-point threat--who is smart and has a nose for the basketball in the paint, but is hardly a defensive stopper and doesn't even play as large as his 6-11 height, which is a good half-foot shorter than Yao. Their power forward, Carlos Boozer, has brawn but is perhaps generously listed at 6-9.
Expect Sloan to double-down on Yao from a number of angles and try a variety of different players and looks on him. He certainly has some compelling pieces. Swingman Kirilenko is a defensive beast but will probably spend almost all of his time occupying Tracy McGrady. Backup center Jarron Collins is physical and disciplined, perhaps Utah's best answer if the plan is not to front or double Yao too much. Shooting guard Derek Fisher is wily and experienced at doubling down and will be a Yao pest. Backup small forward Matt Harpring is nearly as large as Boozer and plays a tough, physical game.
In any event, the plan most likely will be to deny Yao touches whenever possible, and collapse on him immediately when he does get the ball. Yao is prone to turnovers not only due to footwork but bringing the ball up to the 6-6 level of his chest. But once he catches and squares to the hoop, he's a deadly midrange jumpshooter with a quick release.
But the Jazz have their own ace in point guard Deron Williams, and it is to their advantage that point guard is where Houston is weakest, with Rafer Alston running the show. Alston shot 37.4% from the field and dished out only 5.4 assists per game. Both stats are a little unfair because more than half his shots were treys (and he made more than 36% of them) and his assist total is deflated because McGrady dominates the backcourt ball possession. But Alston is hardly John Paxton to T-Mac's MJ; he's the opposite of ice water, a streaky, emotional player who makes only 74% of his free throws. But Houston has no viable second option: Alston led the team in minutes played this season.
More importantly, Alston is no match for Williams when the Rockets are on defense. Williams is not only an inch taller but 30 pounds heavier than Alston, and through the tutelage of Sloan and John Stockton (who always played bigger and heavier than he actually was) has learned to excel at shielding the ball with his body on drives and passes. Alston is 16th in the league in steals, but Sloan and Williams are generally too smart to present many opportunities for that.
More likely, Van Gundy will figure out ways to bump Williams off stride, perhaps mixing in a matchup zone and trapping the corners. One advantage for Houston is that with the likes of Yao or Mutumbo underneath, they can gamble and press up on the perimeter. Another intriguing possibility is putting Shane Battier on Williams. (Battier could also find himself guarding Okur on the perimeter while Yao contends with Boozer. That Battier is a plausible option on both the center and point guard attests to his value.) It could backfire--Williams is obviously quicker--but it also might throw a huge monkey-wrench into the best thing the Jazz have going. Put simply, the Jazz don't win unless Williams has a superb series.
* Battle of the boards
With a pair of leviathans in Yao and Mutumbo, a pair of capable forwards off the bench in Juwan Howard and energy guy Chuck Hayes (who may not play much), and a pair of large swingmen in Battier and McGrady, *and* a defensive that generates more missed shots than anyone in the league, Houston grabs a lot of rebounds--43.5 a game, good for second in the NBA, a tenth of a rebound behind the Bulls. But despite its relative lack of size, Utah parlays Sloan's fundamentals into being titans on the boards, owning the largest rebounding differential by far--more than 5.3 per game--of any team in the league.
*Kirilenko on McGrady
It is amazing that only now are we getting around to McGrady. The guy had a fabulous year, averaging 24.6/5.3/6.5 in points/rebounds/assists. Who guards him? Not Derek Fisher--too short and probably too old. Not Gordan Giricek, who is rangy but usually a defensive liability. One interesting choice would be Ronnie Brewer but he's a rook--expect foul trouble if he's on T-Mac. The best bet is obviously Andrei Kirilenko. In fact he's probably the ideal McGrady foil; the problem is, who guards Battier at the other forward spot? Between Yao and T-Mac, not to mention three-point specialist Luther Head off the bench and Battier and Alston also bombing from outside, Sloan is going to have to do a lot of rotating and switching on defense anyway. Whether Kirilenio--a marvelous, Swiss army knife kind of defender, like a more wiry Kevin Garnett--can be as much of a disrupter on D as T-Mac is an igniter on O will be another key to Utah's chances.
* Prediction
I love the Jazz and have great respect for Sloan, but this isn't a good matchup for this team. The six weeks or so Yao sat out with an injury only rested him a bit and made the Rockets more dangerous by gaining confidence from the wins generated in Yao's absence. The Jazz have to figure out a way to fluster both Yao and McGrady--possible, but hardly probably. They can exploit Alston, but the streaky point guard will also be a positive factor at least once. On top of everything else, Houston has earned the home court advantage. The Rockets in five or six.


Maybe I shouldn't have given up my tickets after all ... oh, wait: I can watch them lose in the comfort of home, where beers don't cost $7, I don't have to pay for parking and I'm not likely to get kicked out for screaming obscenities at Davis/Blount/Whitmann/James/McHale/et. al.
Hate to be fair-weather, but I just can't give this team any more money until they show some semblance of having a clue about how to get better.
Hey Cheap Seats Erick,
It's not exactly "selling" season tickets per se.... they are practically GIVING them away!
Lower level season tickets 2 for 1 for $20?!?!?! That's incredible. Face value $75. Simply unreal.
midlife- I agree. Hibbert, Brandon Wright, Horford, Noah, ... any of these guys could help us inside (if they're still around when we pick). And there are at least a half dozen other guys 6-10 or taller who could be good.
Talented as he is, Ricky Davis must go. He's a cancer. I don't care if the Wolves get nothing in return. Addition by subtraction.
I could see them moving Hassell or Jaric somewhere since both of those guys have some trade value. But it had damn well better be part of a deal that gets rid of Davis or Blount or James or Thud.
I cannot believe McHale is staying. Turning this team around, at this point, is at least a 3-year commitment. And that's assuming he starts actually doing things right.
Worst job in Minneapolis right now? Selling Wolves season tickets.
I say we use the pick to swing a deal for Paul Pierce and then somehow land the Cavs banger with the Sideshow Bob hair. He's a free agent isn't he?
So we'd have Pierce scoring the rock, Sideshow Bob nabbing the boards KG doesn't, Foye running the show and McCants adding scoring punch and three-ballin' to the backcourt. James and Blount and Smith off the bench (depending on who gets traded) for a tight, Suns-style rotation.
Fortunately all of the big players in this years draft are better than Paul Grant. Even a huge reach like Tiago Spitter is much, much better than Paul Grant.
I think it's scarier if we don't take any big available and instead select another swing man. This would leave the wolves again needing to trade for a big man.... something that hasn't worked so well over the last couple seasons. Maybe we can convince Stanley Roberts to come out of retirement.
From McFail's press conference this morning. I got this from PA and Dubay on KFAN today:
- McFail will be back.
- They are NOT trading KG this summer.
- McFail said he "didn't care" about all the FIRE MCFAIL signs. "They can bring them for all I care."
- Taylor/McFail want Wittman (and he will be) back next year.
- "Need to get bigger" said McFail.
- Need to make roster changes. Has been talking to 10-12 teams the last few days.
Wow. I'm so pissed right now. All those points are freakin terrible. I've got nothing else at the moment. Just shaking my head.
Well, McHale had a press conference and...
He did a "bad job" but he's staying and he wants Wittman to return as well. Unless Wittman's gone stone crazy, he will accept the invitation to return.
Couldn't they have at the very least announced a coaching search and emphasized that Wittman will be considered for the job? Several coaches might be fired (including Rick Carlisle) this offseason and it seems that we could at least see what our other options are before brining Randy back.
McHale says we need to get bigger. My prediction: a reach for a tall player in the draft who turns out to be a bust. Paul Grant anyone?
This franchise is horrible at public relations, at least make a show of trying to change things.
Other prediction: We lose Garnett and get nothing in return after next season.
Well, we got what we want last night. A win for the Knicks and a loss for our WOlves.
I agree with the the assessment that the team needs to get rid of the players who lack effort and intensity. Davis and Blount top that list. But, something else needs to be addressed after the third year of missing the playoffs in a row and the second season of ending in Tank mode wiht KG home in Malibu --that is the culture of losing that currently permeates the Wolves and certainly has been a part of the atmosphere of the players we want to build around in McCants, Foye and Smith.
Kudos to Aschburner in today's Strib for the excellent analysis of the Wolves season following last night's game. I thought he had many good insights into the culture of learning and ineptitude of the Wolves from the ownership on down. I also enjoyed and found informative Paul Shirley's impression of the Wolves during his short tenure here.
Snyder, The lack of intensity description of Brandon Wrighrt scares me also. I don't know, but I'd prefer a hard worker like Hibbert even if his star portential is much lower. I like Smith as the power forward for the Wolves future right now.
Last night wasn't sport. It was farce pretending to be sport. We watched as a security guard removed the "Fire McHale" bag mask from a fan last night. I was thrilled to see it above the fold on the front of the Strib sports section this morning. A fitting capstone on another disastrous and embarrassing season for the Minnesota Timberwolves.
Mike and Mike on their national radio and TV program expressed disgust at the Minnesota Timberwolves and what they have become. They openly wondered how on earth the sports books could keep last night's game open for betting. Yesterday they told their listeners to bet the house on the Grizz - that it was an ironclad lock.
I heard that McHale has scheduled a press conference today. I predict he will tender his resignation.
I heard Commissioner Stern plans to take action against NBA tanking. The Timberwolves are Exhibit A. I predict we are made an example for the league.
Hope springs eternal . I just can't find any right now.
OK - so it worked out that the Wolves lost and Knicks won, so the Wolves finished tied for 6th-worst overall with Portland and will keep their first round pick. Yay.
I have to say watching the game last night was HARD! If I hadn't gotten a buddy to use the other free ticket I got, I doubt I would have stayed the whole time. Since I did, I'll throw some love to Craig Smith who worked hard to get a double-double in only 28 minutes on the court and finishing with more than twice as many boards as Blount in the same number of minutes.
I wonder - if KG returns and the Wolves somehow still don't manage to get another big man capable of playing inside, should Smith start next year? I'd have to think there's a greater potential he can improve his shooting during the offseason than that Blount is suddenly going to start hitting the boards.
By the way, ESPN Lottery Machine has the Wolves taking PF Brandan Wright. Here's an overview:
-------------------
Similarities: LaMarcus Aldridge meets Rasheed Wallace
Positives: Another super long, athletic big man who spends most of his time around the basket. Runs the floor very well and knows how to get to the rim. Very quick and explosive.
Negatives: Strength is a major issue. He needs at least 20 pounds or more to play his position in the pros. Lacks great perimeter skills at the moment. At times he plays with a lack intensity. Will float at times. His rebounding and shot blocking numbers are a little disappointing considering what he's capable of.
Summary: On potential, he has the chance to be a NBA All-Star. And so far he's proven that with a strong freshman season for Carolina. He has all the tools to be great and his strong performance in the NCAA tournament should guarantee him a spot in the Top 10.
-------------------
Have to say he sounds pretty good, but the "lack of intensity" scares the crap out of me on a team that already has Blount and Davis...
The Rockets look like steamrollers. The classic two superstar team with useful role players. They have a weakness at PG, but Yao and T-Mac, he could play a Steve Kerr stand and shoot type of point guard. With a defensive stopper in Battier, I don't see Williams being good enough to carry the team past so much.
For the wolves, good riddance to a team that said "f... you" to the fans over the last two months. It was a disaster of a lineup with 8 players best playing SG (9 if you count Blount) and yet still they managed to underperform.
Now, our only hope is the draft, but it's a pretty weak hope. We pick 6th or 7th, and that should be out of the big man area and into the swing man picks. Just what we need.
the scary thing about having Blount, Davis, and James on the team is the influence they have on young guys like Foye and Craig who give a damn. That's why you have to try and trade them, and if not then cut them. We're starting to get a nice young nucleus of players, we're in the lottery, it's time to get rid of BDJ and start over
So I decided to have a little fun with numbers and make my case for Randy Foye as Rookie of the Year (I know he shouldn't actually win, but bear with me as this was fun).
The following are Randy Foye's #'s for the 22.8 minutes per game the Wolves brain trust saw fit to play him.
10 points/gm
2.8 assists/gm
2.6 rebounds/gm
The Wolves decided to play Ricky Davis 37.3 minutes / gm and he put up the following #'s.
16.9 points/gm
4.7 assists/gm
3.9 rebounds/gm
Had Randy Foye played Ricky's minutes heres what his #'s would have been with same per minute production.
16.4 points/gm
4.6 assists/gm
4.3 rebounds/gm
Likely rookie of the year winner Brandon Roy averaged the following #'s playing 35.4 minutes/gm, but only appearing in 57 of his teams games (70% of the Blazers season.
16.8 points/gm
4 assists/gm
4.4 rebounds/gm
Given that Randy Foye played in all 82 games and has basically the same per minute per production shouldn't he at least be considered for the award?
I don't remember who here made the comparison, but lets hope that Randy Foye continues his devlopment along the same lines as Derron Williams and surpasses Roy just as sure as Willimas went past Chris Paul during his second year.
I think his development will require the presence of either a point guard specialist as an assistant coach or the signing af an accomplished, yet declining skills veteran point guard. I can't think of any veterans available that would be good at tutoring a young developing poinnt guard, though.
Snyder, Root for the knicks to win and the Wolves to lose.
I'm not a big believer in the "boo," but tonight I encourage all fans in attendance to let Glen Taylor know that what is going on with the organization is unacceptable. Join me in, "Dwayne Casey, Coach of the Year!" taunts and the always popular, "Fire McHale!!!" chant.
My thanks too for the continued treys, Britt. It's weird....normally this is the most exciting part of the year basketball-wise, but this year I'm barely aware what's happening; the treys are pretty much my only link to the NBA.
I think the only problem with play-GM trade speculation, by Britt or anyone else, is that it takes two to tango. We can talk all we want about how we should unload Davis, Blount, etc., but we still need to find another GM who wants them. Barring an out-and-out swindle--and I think we can all agree that McHale is far more likely to be the swindlee than the swindler in such a case--trades are pretty much just exchanging our problems for another team's problems, and unlikely to improve our situation.
On another topic, I too was reading Simmons' column today and noticed his mention of Mike Wilks. Does anyone else besides me regret that the Wolves didn't keep him?
That situation is impossible. Atlanta gets to keep their pick if it falls in the top 3. Otherwise, they have to send it to PHX.
If the Wolves lose tonight, then its better for the Knicks to win.
If we win, then its better for the Bobcats to win.
Thanks Britt for the trey.
Let's hope the Wolves lose tonight and get a friendly bounce this friday when the NBA determines tie-breakers. My mantra has always been whether to buy the hope the Wolves are selling, yet I'm almost giddy with the thought of Oden or Durant. The hope it would represent.
But this is what I'm predicting will happen, just because it's a great story. Atlanta has the fourth-worst record and their pick goes to Phoenix in the Joe Johnson sign and trade. Imagine if Phoenix receives the first pick overall. If they do, don't you have to dangle Garnett in exchange for the pick and whatever contracts are there (Diaw, Banks, etc.)? Imagine Nash, Stoudemire, Marion and Garnett!!!!!
Britt, one suggestion for the last trey. You seldom play GM, yet I for one would love your thoughts on the most creative personnel moves you can think of. Would you try to trade James. Would you buy out Hudson. What would you do with Blount and Jaric for the next three and four years. How about Ricky Avis? Keep him or trade him. Let me ask nice - please.
I agree on Bracey and have been wondering for a while why Wittman didn't use him like Casey had started to. Especially since the Wolves aren't a good outside shooting team, you'd think he would have gotten some minutes at the end of quarters. Think he'll be back? I hope so, he seems like a cool guy and you can never have enough shooters. He reminds me a little of Salim Staudimire from Hotlanta, another second round choice who's a great shooter.
reading a little Bill Simmons on Page 2:
"To win my LVP (Least Valuable Player) Award, you need to negatively affect a team in more ways than just "my eight-figure salary is killing their cap space" or "I drove into a parked car while masturbating to a porn movie."
You need to realize zero percent of your team's expectations, even though it traded a No. 1 pick (and a chance to take Rajon Rondo or Marcus Williams) to create enough cap space for a bench player who could save its best player's legs during the season. You need to be such a ginormous bust that your coach gave up on you within three weeks. You need to be untradable even though you have a reasonable salary ($21 million, five years). You need to become the albatross for a potential championship team that's single-handedly lowering its ceiling from an "A-plus" to an "A-minus." In other words, you need to be Marcus Banks."
Props to McHale for realizing Banks sucks and not re-signing him after last season or jeers for wasting a first-round pick on a guy who hadn't done anything to suggest he was worth it in the first place?
I'll be going to tonight's game because I got free tickets. Looks like Memphis has stopped the tanking since guaranteeing themselves the worst record overall, so I'm hoping no repeat of "Downtown" Mark Madsen or anything else that blatant.
Here's a question for you math folks. I know to root for Sonics, Kings and Blazers tonight, though I doubt it'll help, but who do I root for between Knicks and Bobcats?
If I'm figuring correctly, the Knicks winning would add another 33-win team to the mix to either tie with or finish ahead of the Wolves, but Bobcats winning would ensure another team finishes with at least 34 wins and guarantee the Wolves would at least finish tied for 9th-worst.
I love the piece on Bracey. He was starting to become a part of the rotation before Casey got fired, but Wittman never seemed to give the guy a fair shot.
The Jazz/Rockets series will be a dandy to watch. I think it will be an old fashioned brawl. I love the character and make up of both of these teams.
Also, how do you think the Wolves would have done if they would have kept onto Roy instead of dealing for Foye?
Excellent edition, Britt. Hard to argue with your reasoning for the Great Brittons -- you articulate why I would never vote for Nash better than I could, but I think it's fair logic since he's gotten 2 trophies to brag about. (and to me, Kobe was robbed last year, as Kidd was in 01-02, and KG in 02-03).
Great preview to Rockets-Jazz. I think if any team is the sleeper, it's Houston. When they're knocking efficient on offense and hitting shots, they're real tough to beat! And I'm eager to see if Detroit can gather that veteran swagger and give fits to whoever comes out of the West. Playoff time, baby! Too bad KG's not a part of it. Seeing the young Raptors in the show, to me, is a bittersweet reminder of the old Wolves of the late 90s. Hard to believe the Wolves have likely peaked. Oh well...
..Let the games begin!
I haven't had a chance to read the trey yet. When I do, I'll be back, but here is a link from a great piece today in the Washington Post about the NBA's handling of the Duncan-Crawford incident and its aftermath:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/17/AR200704...
Without a doubt, Bracey Wright was the "Forgotten Man" on the Wolves bench. I've not found fault with his play. McCants is flashier, but I think Wright is by far the better team player. I remain mystified at (and soured by) the Wolves front office and by extension, coaching decisions.
Rockets v. Jazz should be fun to watch, thanks Britt for the detailed analysis of matchups. I keep hoping that Yao develops into the dominate force his physical attributes suggest he could become. On the other hand, I love seeing the triumph of team play over individualism.
San Antonio and Detroit are the teams I am pulling for.