1. Warriors in Command
The big news of the first round of the NBA playoffs is obviously Golden State's 3-1 lead over 67-win Dallas, a series that would have any neutral observer pulling hard for the Warriors even if he/she didn't know they were enormous underdogs. Golden State epitomizes the coming out of FUN in the NBA this post-season, flipping the bird to the conventional wisdom that you need an airtight freeze-dried stiff upper-lipped dose of disciplined, didactic conservatism in order to win pro hoops in the spring. In fact three of the four most enjoyable teams among the 16 combatants are painting mustaches and spinning whirlagigs on that shibboleth.
No, the new news is that speed, athleticism, transition flow, and ball movement are threatening to be in vogue for the first moment since the Showtime Lakers a pair of decades ago. And joining Steve Nash as the poster child of this stomp-the-throttle fantasia is Baron Davis, who is turning in a folk hero style performance this series. If you like serendipity, your favorite Baron moment tonight was the half-court bank-in to the tie the game at the halftime buzzer. If its plain grit and hustle you hanker for, that jousting with Jason Terry for the steal on the out-of-bounds pass and subsequent transition layup with Terry riding his hip like a bad jockey, all in the last three seconds of the third period, comes out on top. And if seize the moment ingenuity is your thing, Baron's rebound off his own free throw miss and followup lay-in might be the snapshot.
Of course everybody is going to gush about Golden State--we've all got guilty consciences for picking against them, not truly believing until tonight's gritty victory. That they still might lose is a possibility, of course, but irrelevant to the lasting glory of these first four games. If they keep going, sweet. But it's that initial rush that really salts away the memories. Golden State fans feel better right now than they will if the Warriors win 55 games and make it to the conference finals next year.
There are a couple of things still worth pointing out about Dallas, however. First, the universally accepted label slapped on the Mavs was that they were stylistically versatile, that they could play Bump and Grind with the Spurs and the Jazz and Beat the Clock with the flyboys. But it wasn't so. Of the team's mere 15 losses in regular season play, a third of them were to Golden State, who beat them in all three meetings, and Phoenix, who beat them twice in a row in the final couple months of the season. People mistake the Mavs' quickness for a team that enjoys transition play. They don't. Even their fastest players like Devon Harris and Josh Howard have the sort of explosiveness that works best in the half-court for them, and regular rotation guys like Nowitzki, Stackhouse, Dampier, and Terry don't thrive against teams that love uptempo play. And if you need further convincing, the 45-4 edge the Warriors had in fast break points tonight over the first 46 minutes of the game might be the smoking gun.
Second, this has not been a good series for Avery Johnson, who was the single biggest reason why I decided the Mavs could withstand what was clearly going to be a difficult series for Dallas (but highly entertaining for the rest of us). It began when he went small with the lineup change, a move subsequently discredited by the fine performance of Dasagana Diop in the middle, who has been as much of an obstacle to the Warriors as anyone in a Dallas uniform--the key to tonight's game was when he picked up his 5th foul with the Mavs up 7 in the fourth period. The other mark against Avery is that his inflammable emotions on the sidelines haven't inspired his squad and may have contributed to their rattled demeanor. There was no way for anyone to know how the Mavs would react, of course, but if anyone should have had a clue, it was Avery.
Third, as someone who has watched Kevin Garnett be pilloried for playing fundamentally sound, unselfish basketball for lo these many years, I'm a little suspicious on the pile-on Nowitzki is being subjected to right now. TNT announcer Dick Stockton (oh I wish Harlen and Collins could have done this game) was a real asshole about it, justifiably pointing out Nowitzki's absence of aggressive point scoring, but either deliberately or blindly not noticing all the little things Nowitzki was doing on defense and for ball movement tonight. Granted, Nowitzki has not had a great series by any means, but neither has it been a classic choke--far from it. According to the popcornmachine.net totals, Dallas was +3 tonight in the 47:09 Nowitzki played, and -7 in the 51 seconds he sat.
2. Bullish in the East
Speed kills, exhibit B was Chicago's sweep over ossified Miami, the pathetic defending champs who mailed in the entire regular season in the belief they could just flip a switch in the playoffs, only to get de-pantsed by the Bulls' squadron of small, quick, very talented and poised top 5: Deng, Gordon, Wallace, Nocioni and Hinrich, with PJ Brown the token slowfoot.
My advice to any neophyte or otherwise clueless GM: Get some players from Argentina. Like Manu Ginobili, Nocioni seems to kick it up a notch when it matters most--otherwise known as having a killer instinct. Deng, like Baron Davis, is writing his name in neon across these playoffs, sending poor Eddie Jones packing with his combination of strength, size and quickness. Gordon has so much confidence in his shot right now that a priority for opponents should be to frustrate him and get him out of sync, even at the expense of leaving others open a little more. Wallace is the experienced hand, the guy who can battle in the paint and play superb interior D without retarding the high powered pace that is the Bulls metier. And Hinrich, well, he had an off-series, beset by fouls, and if the Bulls are going to beat the Pistons in the second round, he'll have to raise his game and move his feet better against Chauncey Billups. I wouldn't bet against it.
3. Hidebound SOB/PhDs in San Antonio
Watching these games for the pure basketball of it all, I found myself rooting for Golden State (even my disdain for Don Nelson abating), Phoenix, Chicago, and....the Spurs. How could this be? AI is one of my all-time couch potato lures, and I dislike Tim Duncan's "noble carriage but blatant whiner" hypocrisy almost as much as ref Joey Crawford. Worse, if there is a team that can send the NBA back to the stone age in terms of bruise-over-cruise prioritizing, it is Gregg Popovich's unmerry men.
But damn it if the Spurs don't have grit and guile and team synergy that isn't lightning in a bottle but fermented for eight years in oaken casks in the dusky depths of their collective souls. The key plays in Saturday night's pivotal road win over Denver were Robert Horry's steal and bucket to trigger a deadly surge at the end of the third quarter, and Michael Finley making them pay for doubling Duncan while keeping close watch on Ginobili and Parker--he buried treys. The key plays that nobody ever thinks about being key plays were all the times the Spurs scrambled back on defense.
I don't understand why Pops wants to throw Bowen on Iverson every third or fourth possession, especially when Tony Parker is playing decent D for a change and hair-shirt defenders like Bowen are the only guys that usually give Carmelo Anthony fits. But I don't think it is a very bright idea to criticize Gregg Popovich's decisions about how to play defense. Still, it's a head-scratcher that doesn't seem to be working.
Another reason I swung to the Spurs is Denver feels like a punk-ass outfit. Nene has had a bevy of marvelous moments, but is still prone to putting a little mustard on the rage when he finishes an open dunk with his team down 6 with two minutes to go--and he's whining more than Duncan. Karl hasn't worn well since his heyday in Seattle, even, or especially, his fluke year in Milwaukee that bagged him the huge contract. And Melo, well, Melo is the poor man's Kobe Bryant, and that is not a compliment. Can score in the clutch. Does a lot of things well. Obviously smart, pretty well-spoken, and often fun to watch. But from afar, he doesn't feel like a great teammate--there's a distance there that might be arrogance or immaturity or simply a lack of inspirational leadership. In a playoff year when speed and transition are the rule, a squad with Melo and AI should ready for their close-ups. Instead, the Nugs don't seem ready. Or maybe the Spurs are simply that good.


I guess I could have been clearer. I would not trade KG. He should be able to retire here if he wants because what we could get would at best make as a borderline playoff/lottery team.
Moroni,
The small theory would support us drafting someone like Noah/Brewer instead of Hibbert. This theory was also just validated by the Warriors shocking triumph over Dallas. Smaller, qucker, more athletic players beat up on Dallas. Dirk just had the most famous disappearing act a superstar has had in years. Golden State threw a lot of people at Nowitzky, but everytime I saw a highlight it was Stephen Jackson bodying him up.
Go Golden State !
FYI:
Bill Russell has a blog
http://www.nba.com/playoffs2007/news/billrussell_postseason.html
There is much talk about how the NBA has become a smaller, quicker game because of the success of Phoenix and the implementation of the hand-checking rules. While there is certainly truth behind both those theories I thought of another reason more teams are willing to go small. For about a decade, the NBA championship ran through Shaq. Any team that wanted to win a championship would have to have a couple bigs they could throw at the Diesel. Now that Shaq is in decline, teams don't need to account for him nearly as much, and can win a championship without playing stone-handed 7 footers. I think the NBA going small has a lot to do with Shaq's decline and that is truly a testament to his dominance.
Back to 'current' events -- Golden State actually pulled it off! Emphatically out-hustling, out-shooting, out-playing the team that seemed invincible just weeks ago. What's more, it seems that these Warriors will very likely end up in the Conf Finals. But my question, will the Mavs bring back the same squand in 07-08, motivated by this year's humiliation and committed to idea that they should never ever settle for a loss, no matter how inferior their opponent? It will take that sort of relentless drive, i think, to mount a serious run at a title and prevent a Nick Anderson-esque loss of confidence for the entire roster. And what about Dirk? I can't help but feel for him, thinking back to the similar criticism KG has gotten over the years, although Dirk truly played like a pussy in Game 6, period. I hope he learns something from this series. And if he doesn't, the onslaught of public criticism sure will teach him.
Now that Dallas is out -- GO DETROIT!!!
So what are you saying Midlife? Would you trade KG for Bynum and Odom?
I don't think it's enough, and yes, I know we can't expect equal value, but Odom is always hurt, and Bynum isn't even good enough to knock Kwame Brown out of the starting rotation.
I don't want ANYBODY else on that roster.
Furthermore, does anyone think KG likes LA enough to go play with Kobe and a gutted roster?
It sounds like you may be saying that we'd be better off keeping Garnett. If so, we are in total agreement. You don't trade a player of his caliber, unless you have a decent chance to get better. I don't see any team offering that type of package.
I agree almost completely with Patrick. Odom and Bynum definately belong in the NBA, but after that, it's Wolves west. Just like with Kobe & Phil, it's a great testament to KG and Flip to have all those 50 win seasons, even with the one&done at the end.
The problem with losing a star player (like Shaq in LA or us if we trade Garnett), is that the loss doesn't replace the great player. Chicago, for example, crushes us at every position except for Garnett's, and we swept them this year. They have alot of good players, but we're not getting 5 starters for Garnett. That means we keep the bad parts of this roster. Even as we get rightfully excited about Smith, he wouldn't be the same if everyone was worried about where he was on the glass, rather than his gangly teammate. And every wolves player looks a little better when they catch the passes out of the post. Garnett will not get us a Herschel Walker trade. We need to be as realistic about that as we should be about the draft (unless we get a top two pick).
I'd love to see Camby in a Wolves uniform, and Reggie Evans wouldn't be bad either. What do you think it would take to pry Camby away from the Nuggets?
I don't see any scenario where the Wolves trade KG to the Lakers. They could give us their entire team ex. Kobe and it would still be a gift.
Half that team doesn't even belong in the NBA. The fact that they got into the playoffs should be reason enough to give Kobe the MVP and Phil Jackson Coach of the Year.
The play of Amare Stoudamire will determine the outcome of the Spurs-Suns series. If he can be a defensive force in the middle, I think the Suns will be tough to beat. However, if he focuses too much on offense, and getting his points against the Spurs tough interior D he could be detrimental to the Suns. This has the makings of a classic, can't wait to hear your take, Britt. I also can't wait for the Warriors-Dallas tip tonight.
I'm going to take Britt's side and say while the "inside dirt" is titillating, that's about it.
None of us have any first, or probably even third-hand knowledge of what any NBA team charter flight is like or what they do during their downtime on road trips, let alone the Timberwolves. I'm sure on some level, folks enjoy reading this kind of stuff because they think it offers a simple explanation for everything that's wrong with our team, but I put very little stock in it after reading way too many of those "a source associated with the team" rumors over the years that turned out to be nothing more than a bunch of BS.
As for what else to talk about, there's still always trade wish lists to conjure and draft speculation. I read on ESPN's Rumor Central that the Nuggets are so worried about the luxury tax that they could look to move Camby or Reggie Evans.
Lakers are supposedly putting everyone on the block except Kobe after getting knocked off by the Suns and a big item on the wish list is someone to take over for Smush. Is there any possible scenario that wouldn't involve KG?
All that said, the season ticket story wouldn't surprise me at all. I didn't figure the "Early Bird" tactic would be too successful in the middle of Tankathon 2007. I'll admit I was a little bit tempted, but after renewing my Twins season ticket and just getting a 20% discount for Gopher men's basketball season tickets yesterday because I'm a U of MN Alumni Association member, I'm about tapped now for major investments in our local sports scene.
C'mon Britt.
Your playoff posts are noble and appreciated, but this is a Wolves blog first and foremost. I personally love this inside stuff. Your Glen Taylor interview was a great example. This stuff certainly affects what happens on the court.
And while anything from " an unamed source" must be taken with a grain of salt, you can't just dismiss it outright.
I too wish we could offer our takes on the Wolves playoff performance, but this is all we've got until the draft lotto.
Alright, last one, sorry Britt, I would give the source but it would not be appropriate.
The scene is a high level meeting with Glen Taylor and the Timberwolves sales staff. A member of the sales team is going over the season ticket renewals, stating that we head 11,000 season ticket holders 2 seasons ago, 9,000 season ticket holders this season, but only 3,000 had renewed for next year. Glen Taylor's response, "Haven't the fans heard that I'll be taking a more active role in the organization?"
My take on behind the scenes stuff: First of all, unless it affects the play of the team, it isn't any of my business. Second, unless there is a named source behind the information, I don't believe it. Anonymous gossip is NOT the way you want to judge the talent and parse the future prospects of any team. Sure it's titillating, and I don't begrudge Moroni, a valued contributor in these parts, for putting up what he's heard. But I'd much rather judge the ballclub by what it shows you when the clock is ticking. Meanwhile, there are some fabulous playoff games happening among teams far more worthy of our interest than the Timberwolves. I'll try to post my take on the Spurs-Suns and Bulls-Pistons series--two highly anticipated matchups--in the next couple of days.
Nice dirt Moroni.
Always interesting to get some inside info. It sounds like too much late night carousing may help explain some of the Wolves inconsistency last year. That's actually a good thing, because it is not that hard to fix...assuming mgmt addresses it.
Ask Deepthroat if he has any other nuggets!
I heard from a source who travels on the team plane that the Wolves unit is more dysfunctional than we even imagined. Apparently no team in the league has a worse policy about what happens on the charter plane and what happens when the team arrives in another city, even when there is a game the next day. Apparently there is a HUGE lack of respect for the coaching staff as players blast music and drink on the plane. Apparently KG has no leadership skills whatsoever and doesn't call anyone out for anything. It's not really surprising but just makes you wonder more why KG doesn't take more of an active role in leadership and why we would bring back a coaching staff that no players respect. My source mentioned that he has respect for only two players on the team in terms of their professionalism. Madsen and Foye. At least Foye apparently has his head screwed on strait.
Interesting article in the NY Times today on on a study coming out demonstrating racial bias in NBA officiating - enough to determine the outcome of games depending on the racial make up of the officiating crew.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/02/sports/basketball/02refs.html?ei=5087%...
Patrick -
I totally agree with you. Since we have been treated so pathetically as fans, I sadly say that I would be estatic if we packaged Mike James + Ricky Azzle for a "big name" player (so to speak) and drafted Conley or Hibbert.
IF this happens at the minimum, at least it's an improvement. Then as you said, sign a three point shooter like Carroll and try to get rid of Hudson and possibly Jaric. Perhaps McCants could be packaged with one of them? Or buyout THud. Or pay him and tell him to stay away from the Target Center. I don't care, just get him away from the team.
We are relegated to this because God knows our Front Office won't trade KG, even if a monster deal fell into our laps. Sigh.
I really don't think the Wolves will have too much trouble trading Mike James. Granted, we won't get much for him, but he is a veteran PG, who can provide some scoring off the bench in the right system. Ricky Davis too, if only for the fact that he has one year left on his contract. He'd be perfect for a team that is rebuilding and looking to dump an overpaid legacy player.
If we can get one decent big guy for these two, I'd be pleased. And I think it is very doable.
We either get a top 3 (Oden, Durant, Horford) or we select Mike Conley at #7 or #8. And sign a 3pt shooter via free agency. Then we buy out Huddy.
Does any of this sound unrealistic? I don't think so. And this is just the very minimum, maybe McHale and Co. can pull off some spectacular multi-player trade to land a Kirilenko or someone else high quality? Maybe...could happen.
Any any rate things can only get better.
PA cited a source that said Mike James was a locker room cancer. Maybe that was the thing that burned Casey and then Wittman. Nothing like including Iago in your locker room. But then how do you trade him?
Britt - Have you been reading any of the "Blueprint" tripe from the Wolves home page? The jist is that the Wolves are planning to build around KG + the kids. Everyone else is trade fodder. They want to get vets that complement KG + the kids.
This leads to two obvious questions. 1) Why further torpedo the trade value of your overpaid vets by making them sound so available, and 2) is this *really* their plan? I think many fans would love to see KG, Smith, Foye, McCants + someone start and thrive. But do they really have the guts to play that much youth, and will KG buy in?
What about all the vets they were shopped but couldn't be moved? They'll no doubt be overjoyed with their new role of giving 2nd/3rd year players a rest for a few minutes.
Carlos - The change in style once they led by 9 was so pronounced I just can't imagine that it was a fatigue thing - I think it was a conscious choice. Continued run might have led to 15 or more for the Mavs down the stretch anyways, but I think GS could have hung in there with a few points of their own.
AK,
You make a good point about going against the nature of who you are. I think Golden State tried to manage clock rather than continue their fun free-wheeling style. I just wonder how much fatigue has to do with the decision to try to kill clock or it was just a stupid mistake by Nelson. And its funny that Miller actually suggested they try to kill clock at that point also and I kept thinking no, just keep playing aggressively. Can't wait til Game 6.
I agree. I had been clamoring for us to trade our expiring contracts ($20 Million worth!!!) for Baron Davis at that trade deadline on Wolves message boards, injury concerns and all. I haven't waivered in my opinion that he would be a good fit with KG. I'm not just reacting to a good five games in this playoff series here... I think he and KG would have been a great tandem, due to their respective styles of play. Plus, at the time of the trade deadline Baron was only 25 years old!
PLUS, if we had gotten Baron, the Marko Jaric trade fiasco would have never happened, we wouldn't have paid him $40 Million, and most importantly we wouldn't owe a first round pick to the Clippers.
Chalk it up as one more (among way too many) moves this lame Front Office failed to make.
Baron Davis had one of his most productive seasons this past year, and still missed nearly 20 games. Seriously, the guy hasn't played a full season since 01-02. He's a career 40% shooter, and he has one of the biggest contracts in the league.
Of all all the could've been/should've been roster moves to bitch about, this one is pretty weak.
If you guys hadn't watched him shine in a couple of playoff games recently, he'd be irrelevant.
Even if Baron hadn't worked out for us, we probably could have dealt him to another team, unlike our current crop of overpaid underachievers. I agree with College Wolf, and I suspect the Wolves have missed a lot of similar opportunities (remember the trade exception we never used?) over the years.
Easy there College Wolf. Baron Davis is still an injury prone ball hog in most people's books. The guys always had a lot of talent, but I'd bet you wouldn't be singing his praises had we pulled the trigger on that one.
College Wolf is right on here...
At the time Davis was traded to Golden State my old roomie was an intern in the Wolves front office. He was told the team was about to announce a huge trade at the deadline but it fell through at the last minute. He believed the deal was for Baron Davis but Glen backed out over concerns about Davis' history of injuries and his huge contract. The Hornets were having a Davis fire sale and I believe we could have had him for Spree. I've said it on this forum before and been rebuffed: The Wovles hugely biffed it by not getting something for Spree's expiring deal once they realized he'd soured.
Good thing we didn't trade Spreewell's expiring contract for Baron Davis when we had the chance. I mean, the Hornets DID trade him for Dale Davis (who they cut five days later) and Speedy Claxton. Don't tell me he couldn't have been had.
I think he would have solved our PG issues we've had the past few years. Plus, he's still pretty young. (Just turned 27.) How goddamn depressing.
The reason we didn't hire PJ was because Spree and KG were boyz and obviously Spree had some neagative things to say about PJ. I would guess KG gave that the veto simply because of his relationship with Spree.
The double-clutch three Davis hit last night was incredible to put the Warriors up 6 with only a few minutes to play.
Also, the half-court alley-oop to J-Rich was something you would typically see in an All-Star game, not in the closing minutes of the biggest game for a franchise in a decade. The pass from Baron could not have been better placed, from half-court! Ridiculous. I think Davis may be stealing Sam Cassell's biggest balls title.
AK makes the same point Barkley made after the game last night, but I disagree with it. Immediately after GS went up 112-103, Dirk hit a three, then blocked a GS layup attempt and hit another 3-pointer to cut it to 112-109. There was too much time remaining at that point for GS to simply run down the clock with a mere one-possesion lead. GS got comfortable settling for 3-pointers and failed to execute. Time managment was never a real issue -- poor execution cost them the game. Live or die with the three-pointers, baby.
Carlos:
Last night's game was off the hook fun. Kudos to Dallas. But I blame Don Nelson for not closing the deal.
With about 2:45 to play GS went up 9; 112-103. The comeback was fueled by the high-octane, no-holds-barred, aggressive play of the Baron Davis led Warriors.
Nelson proceeded to turn his team into the Princeton Tigers running a four-corners offense trying to "manage the clock". What a collosal tactical error that was! That decision by Nelson simultaneously put a straightjacket on his squad and allowed Dallas to gather itself to mount a comeback.
If Dallas somehow wins this thing in 7, Don Nelson will look back on the last minutes of Game 5 with utter regret.
Game 5 of the Dallas-Golden State series was one of the best games I've seen since KG's dominating performance against Sacramento back in the 2004 playoffs. The buzz in the 4th quarter of this game was as good as it gets. Before Nowitzky reappeared in the game with two huge 3 pointers and a block, Devn Harris kept the Mavs in this game with some pretty spectacular play. Nowitzky had only scored something like 3 points in the entire second half before he led Dallas to that 15-0 run to win the game.
When Golden State was up 9 with a couple of minutes to play, I thought the Mavs season was over, but they showed real heart iwith that last minute run. Golden State, for their part, also showed heart mounting a huge comeback from an early double digit deficit. In the last couple of minutes, when Golden State squandered their lead, I wonder if it was Avery Johnson's tactical moves to take Davis out of the game or if it was the fact that Davis may have run out of gas because until that point he was simplly in another orbit.
Despite the loss, I like Golden State to wrap up the series at home in the next game. They are siimply playing too good and relaxed right now to blow this. I think they realized they should have wrapped this all up last night and won't waste another opportunity.
AKs mention of the coaching is a sore spot, especially with Carlisle available. I normally think of Barreiro as an overly dramatic cynic, but I'm afraid his country club comments are right on.
Even if we luckily get a top 2 pick, make shrewd moves to dump James and Davis while picking up a big banger and fast passing point guard, I'll still have a hard time getting behind this team with Wittman as the coach. I have seen nothing from him that he can coach at this level.
The last third of the season was as bad of basketball I've seen since the year before Laettner came here, and worse than any other year before or after. I felt better about the team when we were force feeding Gerald Glass minutes.
You know, besides Carlisle, I'm sure PJ would still be available for a head coaching gig.
At this point, can a McHale endorsement of Carlesimo really be considered any better than Taylor's choice of Casey? The Peter Principle tells us that people tend to rise to their level of incompetence. Once named "Coach Of The Century" for Seton Hall, perhaps PJ is far better suited to the mentor role he's playing in SA than the two head coaching jobs he held in the NBA. At least Casey had yet to prove his incompetence at that level.
Two great nuggets from AK. The WSJ piece is very good, albeit not as compelling nor extensive as most of their front page features (I lucked into a $99 a year subscription special offer and consider the Journal the best newspaper in America, despite its moronic editorial page). And the observation about PJ is very enlightening, For the record, PJ is the guy McHale really wanted when Taylor opted for Casey.
First, if you have a chance before tonight's 8:30 tipoff, get your hands on today's Wall Street Journal. There is an excellent front page feature story detailing the animosity between Don Nelson and Mark Cuban. The details add great texture and will give you a nice back story for tonight's contest.
Second, I have an item to tack on to Britt's Spurs remarks. My "expertise" on this matter stems mostly from their last visit to the Target Center on April 13. For reasons I won't go into, I ended up sitting about 8 feet behind the Spurs bench for the entire game.
The hierarchy has one additional key member between Pops and the troops - PJ Carlissimo. As Pop's top dog he was busy throughout the game. Every time a player came off the floor, PJ was up having a one-on-one chat. Most were one way conversations and no one seemed the least surprised. The distribution of power was clear. Pop's eyes are on the floor and he moves the pieces. PJ is looking for issues, suggestions and whatever he can find so that the next time a resting player goes in he's ready to roll.
Great in-game coaching tandem. (Wolves could use one guy as good as either of those two.)
I have been surprised at how badly Avery Johnson has been outcoached. He did an amazing job this season, putting together one of the best regular season marks in recent memory. However, even before the series with G State started, seeds of doubt had been planted in the Mavs' heads. Losing all three matchups with Golden State this year didn't help and I get the sense the Mavs felt sorry for themselves about the matchup they drew. Then, after game one you could see the Mavs were scared. This is a great Mavs team, and I don't think they'll go down without a fight, but what a series. Baron Davis, when healthy is proving he is still a premier player in this league, just too strong for anyone his size to gaurd.
The Rockets and Jazz game last night was a beauty to watch as well. Watching the Rockets play defense makes me despise Wittman even more. When Casey had the Wolves playing defense at the begining of the season, you could tell that given good effort and coaching, the team could be well above average defensively. By the end of the season, no one had anyone elses back, and our defense was attrotious. The Rockets are perfect in their rotations, it's a pleasure to watch how weel they play in the half court. I forget how the matchups work for round two, but if the Rockets get the Warriors, expect slaughter in favor of Houston.
My brother and I were just complaining last night about how awful some of the guys calling the games on TNT and ESPN are. I didn't catch his name, but whoever called the Rockets-Jazz Game 5 was one of the worst I'd ever heard -- he simply watched the play unfold without speaking, calling the action after it had occured and only after what unfolded was obvious to the viewer. Worthless!!!
Then you have guys like Reggie Miller, Jon Barry, Kenny Smith and Bill Walton, who have nothing insightful to say and speak merely in superlatives, cliches, and theories. (Maybe I've gotten spoiled out here in NYC, where we have Marv Albert and Mark Jackson doing Nets games.) Knowlegdable commentary from real experts like Doug Collins and Hubie Brown, and LIVE action calling from Marv and guys like Harlen and even Mark Jones are invaluable, especially in adding that air of importance and excitement of the playoffs that are so often lost in lazy play-by-play and remedial commentary. As I said on a post above...I've learned more from listening to Doug Collins than any other basketball source. That kind of expertise should be a job qualification for these gigs.
In a fast-paced contest of ever-shifting strategies, the announcing crews are so important for viewers. Take last night late in the third quarter after the Nugs had opened up a 6-point lead: Immediately out of the timeout, Collins noted that Pops had gone small with the Spurs, hoping to spread the floor and put the ball in Ginobili's hands while resting Duncan and Parker. Armed with that information, we knew exactly why and how SA made their 7-point spurt to take the lead and swing the game from catch-up to see-saw the rest of the way. Even the most careful and knowledgeable observers probably would have taken a possession or two to glean it. Compare that to a blowhard like Bill Walton, who probably would have been demanding that Ginobili step up, or raving about what had just happened (and moments after ripping the same guy--Walton is the king of the short attention span when what he has previously said is being proven wrong).
Second thing: The hierarchy of the Spurs is more solid than any other NBA squad by a wide margin. At the top is Pops (I'll resist the temptation for an Anglo pun), then Duncan, then Parker, then Ginobili, then Bowen, all with very clearly defined roles. Three of them have three rings, the other two have two. And that is how you get a Michael Finley and a Robert Horry to come over: These guys are smart vets who understand what they can and can't do better than anybody. And they know that they will be slotted into roles in which they can thrive. Compare that to the Nugs calling on JR Smith, one of my least favorite and certainly among the most immature players in the league, and Kleiza, your classic up-and-comer who simply isn't ready for the kind of integrity and intensity the Spurs are going to throw at you in a playoff game.
One last thing: The notion that Tony Parker is a weak NBA defender is being definitively rebutted in this series. Parker's defense on Allen Iverson in the Nugs' make-or-break possessions down the stretch was revelation, and provides an enormous boost to the Spurs chances at yet another ring. If I were George Karl, I'd ride Melo instead of AI until the Spurs adjust in Game Five. Pops obviously has been more concerned with Iverson's penetration (giving Parker plenty of help, including the regular if intermittant dose of Bowen) than Melo's midrange game, and Melo has been hot all series.
What a GREAT Spurs Nuggets game last night. Amazing how SA came back at the end and snatched victory away from the claws of defeat. Horry can play badly all game long and then come back with a dagger like he has done oh so many times. I'm glad SA won. Amazing.
The most glaring thing I have noticed from watching the playoffs is how painfully far away the Wolves are from ever competing with teams like these in big games.
The end of the Nuggets-Spurs game last night reinforces Britt's assertion about the Spurs just being that good. This was a game that Denver seemed in control of until the very end when San Antonio just stole it. And Robert Horry made another huge shot to seal the deal. How many shots does this guy have in him ? He's simply spectacularly reliable.
After watching the Wolves stumble most of the year, it is a great pleasure to see a team such as the Spurs play with such incredible crispness and professionalism on both ends of the court. For sure this is a premier defensive team, but their offensive sets aren't that shabby either. Their passing is so incredibly good and they have players who can perform in the clutch: Horry stands out the most for his clutch shooting, but so does Ginobili and Finley.
Most importantly this is a team that takes care of each other; there's such good chemistry here its sickening. With the Mavs on the ropes, San Antonio has got to be feeling good about their chances at yet another ring.
A few quick thoughts. The more playoffs I've been watching, the more I miss KG. I saw, in the Golden State/ Dallas game, so many little plays that Dirk failed to make and KG would have made. Things such as quality passes (especially from the high post), being in the right defense spot (evidenced by a late uncontested lay in and the BIG 3 by Matt Barnes), taking quality shots, and the general leadership on the floor. It seemed to me that Dirk was a ghost for half of the fourth Quarter. Even if he wouldn't shoot, at least KG would get the ball in his hands.
Secondly, I am in complete agreement in regards to the Nuggets. There is just this unlikeable/immature feel to them, especially Carmelo. I can't embrace him for some reason.
I've loved the playoffs so far, its been great for people to realize that Jason Kidd can still play. I was thinking the other day back to a few years ago when there was speculation of a KG/Jason Kidd combo. My only question is, who, in crunch time, would take the last shot? Because of both players unselifsh attitudes, I think it just might end up as a 24 second violation.
When I heard that Golden State had swept the Mavs during the regular season, it seemed like a real possibiility they could beat Dallas in a post-season 7 game series. Would this series possibly even have been over had it not been for the two ejections in Game 2 ? If Golden State wins (and I agree its far from over), this would have to rank amongst the biggest Round 1 upsets ever, especially after the round expanded to a best 4 of 7.
Dallas cannot be written off, but the matchups are very favorable for Golden State, and matchups are the name of the game. Nelly has proved to be exceptional at forcing Mavs to play to his advantage of tempo and more small ball than Dallas wants to play. He is schooling Avery right now.
And it is so fun to see Dirk double or triple teamed and see him struggling a bit. It isn't that easy when the defense focuses so much attention on you and does it successfully. Somewhere even KG must be smiling.
I like it, College Wolf, but it's hard to imagine another club having interest in any member of last year's Wolves aside from KG.
The exceptions would be Foye and Smith. Personally I'd look into making a play for Paul Pierce with some combo of our youngsters and guys we draft. I believe the Wolves have two second round choices to go along with the first this year.
If we're not trading KG, i'm starting to believe it is unrealistic to try and wait for these kids to develop in time to contend with KG. To try for the playoffs, they've got to get another big timer like Pierce, otherwise, sadly it's hard to see the point in keeping KG here to play with guys who won't be in their prime for two or three seasons.
Game 4 of Dallas-Golden State has finally wiped TWolves speculation from my mind. At least until late-June. Playoff excitement is here! That Game 4 was reee-diculous!
First off, good stuff Britt as usual. You are always so spot on that I can't really dispute anything you are saying lol. Also, I loved your ending comments about your dislike of the Nuggets. I hope they lose badly.
I know we are talking about the playoffs here, but how about mixing in some Wolves off-season talk as well? If you want to just stick to responses of Britt's column, feel free to check out a great TWolves forum (with lots of ongoing Wolves discussion at: http://www.Twolvesblog.com/forum )
Anyhow, as I said... what would you guys do if you were in charge of the Wolves this off-season? What changes would you try to make?
Here's my offseason plan:
1) Assuming not a top three pick, take Brewer or Hibbert. IF some guys like Horford or Acie Law drop in the draft, explore trade options to move down with teams that have multiple draft picks or picks right outside the lottery (e.g. Washington, Philly, Phoenix.) If we are able to trade down (and dump bad contracts such as Thud in the process) take someone like Thad Young, Horford (can't imagine he will drop but you never know) or Acie Law.
2) Explore a Ricky Davis and McCants trade to LAC for Corey Maggette.
3) Probably wouldn't trade KG since the Bulls offer of Deng is most likely off the table. Perhaps I would try to trade KG to Boston if they don't get a lottery pick. Something like their pick this year (3-5 range) Al Jefferson, Theo Ratliff's ghost, and filler (perhaps Gerald Green or Rondo?)
4) If KG is not traded to Boston or Chicago, explore a "non-KG" trade with Utah for AK-47. They wanted Jaric and Madsen in the past, perhaps we could send those two + small filler for AK?
5) Try to trade T-Hud for anything. If unsuccessful, buy him out. Just get his influence away from our young core.
6) Trade Mike James for a servicable big man. The only realistic options I know of right now would be Adonyl Foyle or Nazr Muhammad. However, if we draft Hibbert and trade for AK-47, we might as well keep James as a backup
7) Use part of the MLE on Matt Carroll (a Freddy Hoiberg clone.) Don't use the rest unless a vet comes along for cheap.
8. Sign a good character veteran with the LLE. Not sure who is there off the top of my head, but there has got to be a couple of options.
PG: Foye/James
SG: Maggette/Carroll
SF: AK-47/ Hassell/J. Reed
PF: KG/Craig Smith
C: Hibbert/Blount/Craig Smith
What do you guys think?
Britt, I can tell you and I'd get along just fine with a six-pack and a playoff game. Two things you said resonate with my long time NBA fanatic
convictions...
"(oh I wish Harlen and Collins could have done this game)" & "I dislike Tim Duncan's "noble carriage but blatant whiner" hypocrisy".
I've learned more about NBA basketball from Doug Collins in his 15+ years as an analyst than from any other source. And I've long felt Tim Duncan and his wide-eyed "what I do" stare after whistles make him perhaps the biggest bitch in the league. Amen to your commments. That said..
What'd I tell y'all about Jason Kidd? Swap D for scoring, and he's more valuable than everyone's favorite point guard, Steve Nash. Go Kidd Go!
And I think Barkley's right -- Mavs win Game 5, then all the pressure's shifts on GS for the first time in this series. The Mavs nearly blew a 3-0 lead to Portland a few years back, but are well experienced (and undefeated, if memory serves) in Game 7s. It's far from over.
Now that Baron Davis is healthy and in the playoffs, he's got to be a colossal pain for any team to play against. He can score in bunches, but never forgets his teammates. Back with the hornets he used to say, "I have the utmost confidence that my teammates will knock down shots." That's what keeps his dominance from leading to the Kobe induced haze that clouds the Lakers. And with him channeling (using the beard) Walt Frazier on the defensive side, the Warriors could be a pain for anyone, except the Suns.
Even though I feel like an idiot for picking the Mavs in 4, I'll do the same if/when they play the Suns. In a series of wildly entertaining games (pretty much a Mark Cuban dream come true), I think the Suns having bigs that run will make the difference. Even though I don't believe it can happen, I'm hoping the series goes seven games. It can't get more entertaining. This is practically sacrilege for an old Pistons bad boys fan.
GO ABA!