skip navigation
Road Rake - Cars by Chris Birt

American Aluminum. Good for cans. Bad for engines.

Submitted by Chris Birt on Saturday, June 30, 2007

So I am sitting here at Starbucks this morning and I just overheard something that troubles me. A guy having a drink with his coffee klatsch is saying to his buddy that his "engine blew up" after three years and needs to replaced.

It is an aluminum block engine in a Cadillac. That would make it a Northstar engine. I have picked up from sources recently that this engine is not all that reliable. I have to careful making that statement because I do not have sufficient, empirical evidence.

On the other hand, I know that American car companies came around to making aluminum engines later in life. It stands to reason, therefore, that an engine like the Northstar was not sufficiently stress tested before being rushed into production (to compete with the Germans and Japanese who were then, as now, kicking their butts very, very badly.)

American car companies, you see, still have a thing for iron. Big iron. Massive lumps of wasted alloy. While the strength of this material is beyond reproach, it is also a waste in a car engine. Iron adds weight, and weight, as any hot rod fanatic will tell you (or Richard Simmons for that matter) is never good. Far better to build with a lighter material then add to its tensile strength. This is a lesson the Europeans and Japanese grasped long ago.

I believe than an aluminum engine block in an average BMW lasts longer than one in a Cadillac. The same can be said for a Lexus or Porsche. That is generally accepted amongst car guys.

Continued advertisement

Sadly, America has always been at the forefront of aluminum technology (think and many, many more.) It's a shame that the progress we have made in recycling cans does not appear to have extended to the Cadillacs some still drive.

Pontiyuck

Submitted by Chris Birt on Monday, June 18, 2007

I spend alot, I mean ALOT of time intercepting generally middle-aged people in parking logs and asking them about their rides. So far I have been treated far more graciously than I have by some people on Hennepin Avenue these days (one picked up my sandwich while I was sitting on a bench and proceeded to eat it. Never asked.)

It is therefore with some sadness that I must retract my previous comments about the Pontiac G6 as a "best buy." To put it bluntly, the Pontiac G6 is a piece of crap.

That was confirmed by a lightly coiffed soccer mom in the parking lot of Lunds in Richfield this weekend. This mom was on her second G6 retractable coupe since 2005. While the car looked cool, it also looked plastic ala rubbermaid. Apparently the G6 also "rattled and shook all over the place," which is the reason this nice lady said" she would never, NEVER, buy another."

She was, of course describing the dreaded "cowl shake" that afflicted convertibles throughout the 70s and 80s. In other words, it seems GM still builds them like they used to.

Unlike the car that soon parked right next to the poor woman's Pontiac--a Mini Cooper S in two-tone orange and black. This car does not shake, looks great, and goes like stink.

I tried to strike up another conversation but the stripper hit me.

P.S. It looks like I might try a few rides at Sears next Week or shortly thereafter. I am going to try and get four to eight cars reviewed a month.

advertisement


Where there's a way, there's a will.

Submitted by Chris Birt on Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Stopped by the candy store on Saturday AM and sampled the following: a brand new Viper, Mustang GT500, Maserati Quattroporte, Corvette Z06, BMW M6 (black coupe, gray convertible), Mercedes 600 V12 biturbo, and, uhm, lets see...a few R class Mercedes.

This candy store is also known as Sears Automotive. I intend to drive each of these vehicles over the next month to help you make a purchasing decision. And yes Sears can find a way to make any of them work for you.

You just need the will.

advertisement
Subscribe to the Road Rake Blog RSS Feed